Watters Chase M, Burton Tarea, Kirui Dickson K, Millenbaugh Nancy J
Maxillofacial Injury and Disease Department, Naval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA; Wound Infections Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Maxillofacial Injury and Disease Department, Naval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Infect Drug Resist. 2016 Apr 27;9:71-8. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S103101. eCollection 2016.
Enzymatic debridement is a therapeutic strategy used clinically to remove necrotic tissue from wounds. Some of the enzymes utilized for debridement have been tested against bacterial pathogens, but the effectiveness of these agents in dispersing clinically relevant biofilms has not been fully characterized. Here, we developed an in vitro Staphylococcus aureus biofilm model that mimics wound-like conditions and employed this model to investigate the antibiofilm activity of four enzymatic compounds. Human plasma at concentrations of 0%-50% was supplemented into growth media and used to evaluate biofilm biomass accumulation over 24 hours and 48 hours in one methicillin-sensitive and five methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus. Supplementation of media with 10% human plasma resulted in the most robust biofilms in all six strains. The enzymes α-amylase, bromelain, lysostaphin, and papain were then tested against S. aureus biofilms cultured in 10% human plasma. Quantification of biofilms after 2 hours and 24 hours of treatment using the crystal violet assay revealed that lysostaphin decreased biomass by up to 76%, whereas α-amylase, bromelain, and papain reduced biomass by up to 97%, 98%, and 98%, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that the dispersal agents detached the biofilm exopolysaccharide matrix and bacteria from the growth surface. Lysostaphin caused less visible dispersal of the biofilms, but unlike the other enzymes, induced morphological changes indicative of bacterial cell damage. Overall, our results indicate that use of enzymes may be an effective means of eradicating biofilms and a promising strategy to improve treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.
酶促清创术是临床上用于清除伤口坏死组织的一种治疗策略。一些用于清创的酶已针对细菌病原体进行了测试,但这些制剂在分散临床相关生物膜方面的有效性尚未得到充分表征。在此,我们开发了一种模拟伤口样条件的体外金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜模型,并利用该模型研究了四种酶化合物的抗生物膜活性。将浓度为0%-50%的人血浆添加到生长培养基中,用于评估在一株甲氧西林敏感和五株甲氧西林耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株中24小时和48小时内生物膜生物量的积累。在培养基中添加10%的人血浆导致所有六株菌株中形成最强壮的生物膜。然后针对在10%人血浆中培养的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜测试了α-淀粉酶、菠萝蛋白酶、溶葡萄球菌酶和木瓜蛋白酶。使用结晶紫测定法在处理2小时和24小时后对生物膜进行定量分析,结果显示溶葡萄球菌酶使生物量减少高达76%,而α-淀粉酶、菠萝蛋白酶和木瓜蛋白酶分别使生物量减少高达97%、98%和98%。扫描电子显微镜证实,分散剂使生物膜胞外多糖基质和细菌从生长表面脱离。溶葡萄球菌酶引起的生物膜可见分散较少,但与其他酶不同,它诱导了表明细菌细胞损伤的形态变化。总体而言,我们的结果表明,使用酶可能是根除生物膜的有效手段,也是改善多重耐药细菌感染治疗的有前景的策略。