Mitnitski Arnold, Howlett Susan E, Rockwood Kenneth
Department of Medicine and.
Department of Pharmacology (Division of Geriatric Medicine), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Jul 1;72(7):877-884. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw089.
Understanding the heterogeneity in health of older adults is a compelling question in the biology of aging. We analyzed the performance of five measures of health heterogeneity, judging them by their ability to predict mortality. Using clinical and biomarker data on 1,013 participants of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging who were followed for up to 6 years, we calculated two indices of biological age using the Klemera and Doubal method, which controversially includes using chronological age as a "biomarker," and three frailty indices (FIs) that do not include chronological age: a standard clinical FI, an FI from standard laboratory blood tests and blood pressure, and their combination (FI-combined). Predictive validity was tested using Cox proportional hazards analysis and discriminative ability by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves. All five measures showed moderate performance that was improved by combining measures to evaluate larger numbers of items. The greatest addition in explanatory power came from the FI-combined that showed the best mortality prediction in an age-adjusted model. More extensive comparisons across different databases are required, but these results do not support including chronological age as a biomarker.
了解老年人健康状况的异质性是衰老生物学中一个引人关注的问题。我们分析了五种健康异质性指标的表现,并根据它们预测死亡率的能力对其进行评判。利用加拿大健康与老龄化研究中1013名参与者的临床和生物标志物数据(对这些参与者进行了长达6年的随访),我们采用克莱梅拉和杜巴尔方法计算了两个生物学年龄指数(该方法存在争议,因为它将实际年龄用作“生物标志物”),以及三个不包括实际年龄的衰弱指数(FI):一个标准临床FI、一个来自标准实验室血液检测和血压的FI,以及它们的组合(组合FI)。使用Cox比例风险分析测试预测效度,通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积测试判别能力。所有这五种指标都表现出中等性能,通过组合指标以评估更多项目可使其性能得到改善。解释力的最大提升来自组合FI,它在年龄调整模型中显示出最佳的死亡率预测效果。需要在不同数据库之间进行更广泛的比较,但这些结果不支持将实际年龄用作生物标志物。