Suppr超能文献

终末期肾病患者的疾病认知及其与自我护理方式选择的关联

Illness Beliefs in End Stage Renal Disease and Associations with Self-Care Modality Choice.

作者信息

Jayanti Anuradha, Foden Philip, Wearden Alison, Mitra Sandip

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Central Manchester Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 1;11(7):e0154299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154299. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interest in self-care haemodialysis (HD) has increased because it improves patients'clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. Patients who undertake self-management for haemodialysis may hold illness beliefs differently to those choosing institutional care at the time of making the modality choice or moulded by their illness and dialysis treatment experience. Illness perceptions amongst predialysis patients and in those undertaking fully-assisted and self-care haemodialysis are being investigated in a combined cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

STUDY DESIGN

The study data are derived from the BASIC-HHD study, a multicentre observational study on factors influencing home haemodialysis uptake. 535 patients were enrolled into three groups: Predialysis CKD-5 group, prevalent 'in-centre' HD and self-care HD groups (93% at home). We explore illness perceptions in the cross-sectional analyses of the three study groups, using the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Predialysis patients' illness beliefs were reassessed prospectively, typically between 4 and 12 months after dialysis commencement.

RESULTS

Illness belief subscales are significantly different between in-centre and self-care HD groups. In a step-wise hierarchical regression analysis, after adjustment for age, education, marital status, diabetes, dialysis vintage, depression, anxiety scores, and IPQ-R subscales, personal control (p = 0.01) and illness coherence (p = 0.04) are significantly higher in the self-care HD group. In the predialysis group, no significant associations were found between illness representations and modality choices. In prospectively observed predialysis group, scores for personal control, treatment control, timeline cyclical and emotional representations reduced significantly after commencing dialysis and increased significantly for illness coherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Illness beliefs differ between hospital and self-care haemodialysis patients. Patient's affect and neurocognitive ability may have an important role in determining illness beliefs. The impact of modality upon illness representations may also be significant and remains to be explored.

摘要

背景

对自我护理血液透析(HD)的兴趣有所增加,因为它能改善患者的临床和生活质量结局。进行血液透析自我管理的患者在做出治疗方式选择时,其疾病认知可能与选择机构护理的患者不同,或者会受到其疾病及透析治疗经历的影响。一项横断面与纵向相结合的研究正在调查透析前患者以及接受完全辅助和自我护理血液透析患者的疾病认知情况。

研究设计

研究数据来源于BASIC-HHD研究,这是一项关于影响家庭血液透析接受率因素的多中心观察性研究。535名患者被分为三组:透析前慢性肾脏病5期组、现患“中心”血液透析组和自我护理血液透析组(93%为居家透析)。我们使用修订后的疾病认知问卷(IPQ-R)对三个研究组进行横断面分析,以探究疾病认知情况。对透析前患者的疾病认知进行前瞻性重新评估,通常在开始透析后的4至12个月之间。

结果

“中心”血液透析组和自我护理血液透析组之间的疾病认知子量表存在显著差异。在逐步分层回归分析中,在对年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况、糖尿病、透析龄、抑郁、焦虑评分和IPQ-R子量表进行调整后,自我护理血液透析组的个人控制感(p = 0.01)和疾病连贯性(p = 0.04)显著更高。在透析前组中,疾病表征与治疗方式选择之间未发现显著关联。在前瞻性观察的透析前组中,开始透析后个人控制感、治疗控制感、时间线周期性和情感表征得分显著降低,而疾病连贯性得分显著升高。

结论

医院血液透析患者和自我护理血液透析患者的疾病认知不同。患者的情感和神经认知能力在决定疾病认知方面可能起重要作用。治疗方式对疾病表征的影响也可能很大,有待进一步探索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验