Tarvasmäki Tuukka, Lassus Johan, Varpula Marjut, Sionis Alessandro, Sund Reijo, Køber Lars, Spinar Jindrich, Parissis John, Banaszewski Marek, Silva Cardoso Jose, Carubelli Valentina, Di Somma Salvatore, Mebazaa Alexandre, Harjola Veli-Pekka
Emergency Medicine, University of Helsinki and Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Division of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Crit Care. 2016 Jul 4;20(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1387-1.
Vasopressors and inotropes remain a cornerstone in stabilization of the severely impaired hemodynamics and cardiac output in cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of this study was to analyze current real-life use of these medications, and their impact on outcome and on changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time in CS.
The multinational CardShock study prospectively enrolled 219 patients with CS. The use of vasopressors and inotropes was analyzed in relation to the primary outcome, i.e., 90-day mortality, with propensity score methods in 216 patients with follow-up data available. Changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time until 96 hours from baseline were analyzed with linear mixed modeling.
Patients were 67 (SD 12) years old, 26 % were women, and 28 % had been resuscitated from cardiac arrest prior to inclusion. On average, systolic blood pressure was 78 (14) and mean arterial pressure 57 (11) mmHg at detection of shock. 90-day mortality was 41 %. Vasopressors and/or inotropes were administered to 94 % of patients and initiated principally within the first 24 hours. Noradrenaline and adrenaline were given to 75 % and 21 % of patients, and 30 % received several vasopressors. In multivariable logistic regression, only adrenaline (21 %) was independently associated with increased 90-day mortality (OR 5.2, 95 % CI 1.88, 14.7, p = 0.002). The result was independent of prior cardiac arrest (39 % of patients treated with adrenaline), and the association remained in propensity-score-adjusted analysis among vasopressor-treated patients (OR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.3, 7.2, p = 0.013); this was further confirmed by propensity-score-matched analysis. Adrenaline was also associated, independent of prior cardiac arrest, with marked worsening of cardiac and renal biomarkers during the first days. Dobutamine and levosimendan were the most commonly used inotropes (49 % and 24 %). There were no differences in mortality, whether noradrenaline was combined with dobutamine or levosimendan.
Among vasopressors and inotropes, adrenaline was independently associated with 90-day mortality in CS. Moreover, adrenaline use was associated with marked worsening in cardiac and renal biomarkers. The combined use of noradrenaline with either dobutamine or levosimendan appeared prognostically similar.
血管升压药和正性肌力药仍然是心源性休克(CS)中严重受损血流动力学和心输出量稳定的基石。本研究的目的是分析这些药物在当前实际应用中的情况,以及它们对CS患者结局、心脏和肾脏生物标志物随时间变化的影响。
多国CardShock研究前瞻性纳入了219例CS患者。采用倾向评分法,对216例有随访数据的患者,分析血管升压药和正性肌力药的使用与主要结局即90天死亡率的关系。采用线性混合模型分析从基线至96小时心脏和肾脏生物标志物随时间的变化。
患者年龄为67(标准差12)岁,26%为女性,28%在纳入研究前曾从心脏骤停中复苏。休克发生时,平均收缩压为78(14)mmHg,平均动脉压为57(11)mmHg。90天死亡率为41%。94%的患者使用了血管升压药和/或正性肌力药,主要在最初24小时内开始使用。75%和21%的患者分别使用了去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素,30%的患者接受了几种血管升压药。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,只有肾上腺素(21%)与90天死亡率增加独立相关(比值比5.2,95%置信区间1.88,14.7,p = 0.002)。该结果与先前的心脏骤停无关(39%接受肾上腺素治疗的患者),在血管升压药治疗患者的倾向评分调整分析中该关联仍然存在(比值比3.0,95%置信区间1.3,7.2,p = 0.013);倾向评分匹配分析进一步证实了这一点。无论先前是否发生心脏骤停,肾上腺素还与最初几天心脏和肾脏生物标志物的显著恶化相关。多巴酚丁胺和左西孟旦是最常用的正性肌力药(分别为49%和24%)。去甲肾上腺素与多巴酚丁胺或左西孟旦联合使用时,死亡率没有差异。
在血管升压药和正性肌力药中,肾上腺素与CS患者的90天死亡率独立相关。此外,使用肾上腺素与心脏和肾脏生物标志物的显著恶化相关。去甲肾上腺素与多巴酚丁胺或左西孟旦联合使用在预后方面似乎相似。