Suppr超能文献

NPM1 和 FLT3-ITD 等位基因比分类的细胞遗传学正常 AML 缓解后治疗的比较价值。

Comparative value of post-remission treatment in cytogenetically normal AML subclassified by NPM1 and FLT3-ITD allelic ratio.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2017 Jan;31(1):26-33. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.183. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

Abstract

Post-remission treatment (PRT) in patients with cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) is debated. We studied 521 patients with CN-AML in CR1, for whom mutational status of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD was available, including the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio. PRT consisted of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) (n=68), myeloablative conditioning (MAC) alloHSCT (n=137), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) (n=168) or chemotherapy (n=148). Favorable overall survival (OS) was found for patients with mutated NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (71±4%). Outcome in patients with a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio appeared to be very poor with OS and relapse-free survival (RFS) of 23±8% and 12±6%, respectively. Patients with wild-type NPM1 without FLT3-ITD or with a low allelic burden of FLT3-ITD were considered as intermediate-risk group because of similar OS and RFS at 5 years, in which PRT by RIC alloHSCT resulted in better OS and RFS as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, P=0.022 and HR 0.50, P=0.004, respectively) or autoHSCT (HR 0.60, P=0.046 and HR 0.60, P=0.043, respectively). The lowest cumulative incidence of relapse (23±4%) was observed following MAC alloHSCT. These results suggest that alloHSCT may be preferred in patients with molecularly intermediate-risk CN-AML, while the choice of conditioning type may be personalized according to risk for non-relapse mortality.

摘要

对于细胞遗传学正常(CN)的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者在首次完全缓解(CR1)后的治疗(PRT)存在争议。我们研究了 521 例 CN-AML 患者,这些患者在 CR1 时具有 NPM1 和 FLT3-ITD 的突变状态,包括 FLT3-ITD 等位基因比。PRT 包括减低强度的预处理(RIC)异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHSCT)(n=68)、大剂量预处理(MAC)alloHSCT(n=137)、自体造血干细胞移植(autoHSCT)(n=168)或化疗(n=148)。突变型 NPM1 而无 FLT3-ITD 的患者具有良好的总生存(OS)(71±4%)。高 FLT3-ITD 等位基因比的患者的结局似乎非常差,OS 和无复发生存率(RFS)分别为 23±8%和 12±6%。野生型 NPM1 而无 FLT3-ITD 或 FLT3-ITD 低负荷的患者被认为是中危组,因为 5 年时的 OS 和 RFS 相似,RIC alloHSCT 的 PRT 与化疗(风险比(HR)0.56,P=0.022 和 HR 0.50,P=0.004)或 autoHSCT(HR 0.60,P=0.046 和 HR 0.60,P=0.043)相比,OS 和 RFS 更好。MAC alloHSCT 后观察到的复发累积发生率最低(23±4%)。这些结果表明,alloHSCT 可能是分子中危 CN-AML 患者的首选,而预处理类型的选择可能需要根据非复发死亡率的风险进行个体化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验