Pal Deb K, Ferrie Colin, Addis Laura, Akiyama Tomoyuki, Capovilla Giuseppe, Caraballo Roberto, de Saint-Martin Anne, Fejerman Natalio, Guerrini Renzo, Hamandi Khalid, Helbig Ingo, Ioannides Andreas A, Kobayashi Katsuhiro, Lal Dennis, Lesca Gaetan, Muhle Hiltrud, Neubauer Bernd A, Pisano Tiziana, Rudolf Gabrielle, Seegmuller Caroline, Shibata Takashi, Smith Anna, Striano Pasquale, Strug Lisa J, Szepetowski Pierre, Valeta Thalia, Yoshinaga Harumi, Koutroumanidis Michalis
Department of Basic & Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK, Kings College and Evelina Children's Hospitals, London, UK.
Leeds General Infirmary, Paediatric Neurology, Leeds, UK.
Epileptic Disord. 2016 Sep 1;18(3):252-88. doi: 10.1684/epd.2016.0839.
The term idiopathic focal epilepsies of childhood (IFE) is not formally recognised by the ILAE in its 2010 revision (Berg et al., 2010), nor are its members and boundaries precisely delineated. The IFEs are amongst the most commonly encountered epilepsy syndromes affecting children. They are fascinating disorders that hold many "treats" for both clinicians and researchers. For example, the IFEs pose many of the most interesting questions central to epileptology: how are functional brain networks involved in the manifestation of epilepsy? What are the shared mechanisms of comorbidity between epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorders? How do focal EEG discharges impact cognitive functioning? What explains the age-related expression of these syndromes? Why are EEG discharges and seizures so tightly locked to slow-wave sleep? In the last few decades, the clinical symptomatology and the respective courses of many IFEs have been described, although they are still not widely appreciated beyond the specialist community. Most neurologists would recognise the core syndromes of IFE to comprise: benign epilepsy of childhood with centro-temporal spikes or Rolandic epilepsy (BECTS/RE); Panayiotopoulos syndrome; and the idiopathic occipital epilepsies (Gastaut and photosensitive types). The Landau-Kleffner syndrome and the related (idiopathic) epilepsy with continuous spikes and waves in sleep (CSWS or ESES) are also often included, both as a consequence of the shared morphology of the interictal discharges and their potential evolution from core syndromes, for example, CSWS from BECTS. Atypical benign focal epilepsy of childhood also has shared electro-clinical features warranting inclusion. In addition, a number of less well-defined syndromes of IFE have been proposed, including benign childhood seizures with affective symptoms, benign childhood epilepsy with parietal spikes, benign childhood seizures with frontal or midline spikes, and benign focal seizures of adolescence. The term "benign" is often used in connection with the IFEs and is increasingly being challenged. Certainly most of these disorders are not associated with the devastating cognitive and behavioural problems seen with early childhood epileptic encephalopathies, such as West or Dravet syndromes. However, it is clear that specific, and sometimes persistent, neuropsychological deficits in attention, language and literacy accompany many of the IFEs that, when multiplied by the large numbers affected, make up a significant public health problem. Understanding the nature, distribution, evolution, risk and management of these is an important area of current research. A corollary to such questions regarding comorbidities is the role of focal interictal spikes and their enduring impact on cognitive functioning. What explains the paradox that epilepsies characterised by abundant interictal epileptiform abnormalities are often associated with very few clinical seizures? This is an exciting area in both clinical and experimental arenas and will eventually have important implications for clinical management of the whole child, taking into account not just seizures, but also adaptive functioning and quality of life. For several decades, we have accepted an evidence-free approach to using or not using antiepileptic drugs in IFEs. There is huge international variation and only a handful of studies examining neurocognitive outcomes. Clearly, this is a situation ready for an overhaul in practice. Fundamental to understanding treatment is knowledge of aetiology. In recent years, there have been several significant discoveries in IFEs from studies of copy number variation, exome sequencing, and linkage that prompt reconsideration of the "unknown cause" classification and strongly suggest a genetic aetiology. The IFE are strongly age-related, both with regards to age of seizure onset and remission. Does this time window solely relate to a similar age-related gene expression, or are there epigenetic factors involved that might also explain low observed twin concordance? The genetic (and epigenetic) models for different IFEs, their comorbidities, and their similarities to other neurodevelopmental disorders deserve investigation in the coming years. In so doing, we will probably learn much about normal brain functioning. This is because these disorders, perhaps more than any other human brain disease, are disorders of functional brain systems (even though these functional networks may not yet be fully defined). In June 2012, an international group of clinical and basic science researchers met in London under the auspices of the Waterloo Foundation to discuss and debate these issues in relation to IFEs. This Waterloo Foundation Symposium on the Idiopathic Focal Epilepsies: Phenotype to Genotype witnessed presentations that explored the clinical phenomenology, phenotypes and endophenotypes, and genetic approaches to investigation of these disorders. In parallel, the impact of these epilepsies on children and their families was reviewed. The papers in this supplement are based upon these presentations. They represent an updated state-of-the-art thinking on the topics explored. The symposium led to the formation of international working groups under the umbrella of "Luke's Idiopathic Focal Epilepsy Project" to investigate various aspects of the idiopathic focal epilepsies including: semiology and classification, genetics, cognition, sleep, high-frequency oscillations, and parental resources (see www.childhood-epilepsy.org). The next sponsored international workshop, in June 2014, was on randomised controlled trials in IFEs and overnight learning outcome measures.
“儿童特发性局灶性癫痫(IFE)”这一术语在国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)2010年修订版中未被正式认可(Berg等人,2010),其成员和界限也未被精确界定。IFE是影响儿童的最常见癫痫综合征之一。它们是引人入胜的疾病,为临床医生和研究人员带来了许多“惊喜”。例如,IFE引发了癫痫学中许多最有趣的核心问题:功能性脑网络如何参与癫痫的表现?癫痫与神经发育障碍共病的共同机制是什么?局灶性脑电图放电如何影响认知功能?如何解释这些综合征与年龄相关的表现?为什么脑电图放电和癫痫发作与慢波睡眠紧密相关?在过去几十年里,许多IFE的临床症状学和各自病程已被描述,尽管在专业领域之外它们仍未得到广泛认识。大多数神经科医生会认识到IFE的核心综合征包括:伴有中央颞区棘波的儿童良性癫痫或罗兰多癫痫(BECTS/RE);潘纳约托普洛斯综合征;以及特发性枕叶癫痫(加斯东型和光敏型)。Landau-Kleffner综合征以及相关的睡眠中持续棘波和慢波的(特发性)癫痫(CSWS或ESES)也常被纳入,这既是由于发作间期放电的共同形态,也因为它们可能从核心综合征演变而来,例如,CSWS由BECTS演变而来。儿童非典型良性局灶性癫痫也有共同的电临床特征,值得纳入。此外,还提出了一些定义不太明确的IFE综合征,包括伴有情感症状的儿童良性癫痫、伴有顶叶棘波的儿童良性癫痫、伴有额叶或中线棘波的儿童良性癫痫以及青少年良性局灶性癫痫。“良性”一词常与IFE相关联,且越来越受到质疑。当然,这些疾病大多不会伴有幼儿癫痫性脑病(如韦斯特或德拉韦特综合征)所见的严重认知和行为问题。然而,很明显,许多IFE会伴有特定的、有时持续存在的注意力、语言和读写方面的神经心理学缺陷,当受影响人数众多时,这构成了一个重大的公共卫生问题。了解这些缺陷的性质、分布、演变、风险和管理是当前研究的一个重要领域。与这些共病问题相关的一个推论是局灶性发作间期棘波的作用及其对认知功能的持久影响。如何解释以大量发作间期癫痫样异常为特征的癫痫往往临床发作很少这一矛盾现象?这在临床和实验领域都是一个令人兴奋的领域,最终将对整个儿童的临床管理产生重要影响,不仅要考虑癫痫发作,还要考虑适应性功能和生活质量。几十年来,我们在IFE中使用或不使用抗癫痫药物一直采用无证据的方法。国际上存在巨大差异,只有少数研究考察了神经认知结果。显然,这种情况在实践中亟待彻底改革。理解治疗的基础是病因学知识。近年来,通过拷贝数变异、外显子组测序和连锁分析研究,在IFE方面有了几项重大发现,这促使人们重新考虑“病因不明”的分类,并强烈提示其遗传病因。IFE在癫痫发作起始和缓解年龄方面都与年龄密切相关。这个时间窗口仅仅与类似的年龄相关基因表达有关,还是存在表观遗传因素也可以解释观察到的低双胞胎一致性?不同IFE的遗传(和表观遗传)模型、它们的共病情况以及它们与其他神经发育障碍的相似性值得在未来几年进行研究。这样做,我们可能会对正常脑功能有更多了解。这是因为这些疾病,可能比任何其他人类脑部疾病更甚,是功能性脑系统疾病(尽管这些功能网络可能尚未完全明确)。2012年6月,一组国际临床和基础科学研究人员在滑铁卢基金会的支持下于伦敦会面,讨论并辩论与IFE相关的这些问题。这次关于特发性局灶性癫痫:从表型到基因型的滑铁卢基金会研讨会展示了探讨这些疾病临床现象学、表型和内表型以及遗传研究方法的报告。同时,还回顾了这些癫痫对儿童及其家庭的影响。本增刊中的论文基于这些报告。它们代表了对所探讨主题的最新前沿思考。该研讨会促成了在“卢克特发性局灶性癫痫项目”框架下成立国际工作组,以研究特发性局灶性癫痫的各个方面,包括:症状学和分类、遗传学、认知、睡眠、高频振荡以及家长资源(见www.childhood - epilepsy.org)。下一次由主办方赞助的国际研讨会于2014年6月举行,主题是IFE的随机对照试验和夜间学习结果测量。