Suppr超能文献

情绪强度的神经处理过程可预测情绪调节选择。

Neural processing of emotional-intensity predicts emotion regulation choice.

作者信息

Shafir Roni, Thiruchselvam Ravi, Suri Gaurav, Gross James J, Sheppes Gal

机构信息

The School of Psychological Sciences, and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel,

Department of Psychology, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, USA.

出版信息

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(12):1863-1871. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw114. Epub 2016 Aug 13.

Abstract

Emotional-intensity is a core characteristic of affective events that strongly determines how individuals choose to regulate their emotions. Our conceptual framework suggests that in high emotional-intensity situations, individuals prefer to disengage attention using distraction, which can more effectively block highly potent emotional information, as compared with engagement reappraisal, which is preferred in low emotional-intensity. However, existing supporting evidence remains indirect because prior intensity categorization of emotional stimuli was based on subjective measures that are potentially biased and only represent the endpoint of emotional-intensity processing. Accordingly, this study provides the first direct evidence for the role of online emotional-intensity processing in predicting behavioral regulatory-choices. Utilizing the high temporal resolution of event-related potentials, we evaluated online neural processing of stimuli's emotional-intensity (late positive potential, LPP) prior to regulatory-choices between distraction and reappraisal. Results showed that enhanced neural processing of intensity (enhanced LPP amplitudes) uniquely predicted (above subjective measures of intensity) increased tendency to subsequently choose distraction over reappraisal. Additionally, regulatory-choices led to adaptive consequences, demonstrated in finding that actual implementation of distraction relative to reappraisal-choice resulted in stronger attenuation of LPPs and self-reported arousal.

摘要

情绪强度是情感事件的一个核心特征,它强烈地决定了个体如何选择调节自己的情绪。我们的概念框架表明,在高情绪强度的情况下,个体更喜欢通过分散注意力来脱离注意力,与在低情绪强度下更受青睐的参与性重新评价相比,分散注意力可以更有效地阻止高度强烈的情绪信息。然而,现有的支持证据仍然是间接的,因为之前对情绪刺激的强度分类是基于主观测量,这些测量可能存在偏差,并且只代表了情绪强度处理的终点。因此,本研究为在线情绪强度处理在预测行为调节选择中的作用提供了首个直接证据。利用事件相关电位的高时间分辨率,我们在分散注意力和重新评价之间的调节选择之前,评估了刺激情绪强度的在线神经处理(晚期正电位,LPP)。结果表明,强度的增强神经处理(增强的LPP振幅)独特地预测了(高于强度的主观测量)随后选择分散注意力而非重新评价的倾向增加。此外,调节选择导致了适应性后果,这体现在发现相对于重新评价选择,实际实施分散注意力会导致LPP和自我报告的唤醒更强烈的衰减。

相似文献

1
Neural processing of emotional-intensity predicts emotion regulation choice.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(12):1863-1871. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw114. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
2
Emotional intensity influences pre-implementation and implementation of distraction and reappraisal.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Oct;10(10):1329-37. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv022. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
3
The temporal dynamics of detached versus positive reappraisal: An ERP study.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;17(3):516-527. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0494-4.
4
Turning off hot feelings: Down-regulation of sexual desire using distraction and situation-focused reappraisal.
Biol Psychol. 2018 Sep;137:116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Time course of emotion-related responding during distraction and reappraisal.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Sep;9(9):1310-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst116. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
7
The effect of arousal on regulation of negative emotions using cognitive reappraisal: An ERP study.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Aug;118:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
9
Altered emotion regulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder as evidenced by the late positive potential.
Psychol Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):137-47. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001610. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
Neural correlates of cognitive reappraisal in children: an ERP study.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;2(1):70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional overload in Bulimia Nervosa: an ERP study of emotion processing and regulation.
J Eat Disord. 2025 May 1;13(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01245-7.
2
Negative life events during early adolescence are associated with neural deactivation to emotional stimuli.
Brain Cogn. 2025 Jul;187:106303. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106303. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3
Enough Terror to Belong: The Nonlinear Association of Death Anxiety with Group Identification.
Depress Anxiety. 2024 May 21;2024:3699789. doi: 10.1155/2024/3699789. eCollection 2024.
6
Alexithymia and Emotion Regulation: the Role of Emotion Intensity.
Affect Sci. 2024 Sep 26;6(1):77-93. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00278-6. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Emotion regulation success in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.
Psychol Aging. 2025 May;40(3):278-293. doi: 10.1037/pag0000878. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
8
9
Effects of motivated emotion regulation on downstream memory for and affective responses to re-encountered stimuli.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb;25(1):135-153. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01248-y. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Getting Over It: Long-Lasting Effects of Emotion Regulation on Amygdala Response.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;26(9):1377-88. doi: 10.1177/0956797615578863. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
2
Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):591-612. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504116.
3
Explaining Away: A Model of Affective Adaptation.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):370-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x.
4
Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice.
Emotion. 2015 Dec;15(6):677-81. doi: 10.1037/a0039246. Epub 2015 May 11.
5
Examining Emotion Regulation as an Outcome, Mechanism, or Target of Psychological Treatments.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2015 Jun 1;3:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.02.010.
6
Emotional intensity influences pre-implementation and implementation of distraction and reappraisal.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Oct;10(10):1329-37. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv022. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Choosing how to feel: emotion regulation choice in bipolar disorder.
Emotion. 2015 Apr;15(2):139-45. doi: 10.1037/emo0000024. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
9
ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 14;8:213. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213. eCollection 2014.
10
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验