Jones Andrea A, Ng Enoch, Deguise Marc-Olivier, Mak Lauren, Ouyang Ben, Sivapragasam Milani, MacNairn Ian A S, Nath Siddharth, Benesch Matthew G K, Forrest Laura, Wang Xin
.
Clin Invest Med. 2016 Sep 11;39(4):E132-9. doi: 10.25011/cim.v39i4.27092.
There has been limited examination of clinician scientist training in Canada, particularly regarding training integration and funding. This study assessed program structure, funding, tuition and mentorship structures available at Canadian MD/PhD programs.
Clinician Investigator Trainee Association of Canada administered an anonymous survey to current trainees and program directors that captured program structure, trainee funding, tuition and mentorship opportunities and needs across institutions.
In June 2015, 101/228 (44%) trainees and 9/13 (69%) program directors completed the online survey. In all programs, students completed the PhD degree prior to clerkship training. Seven programs offered research training upon completion of pre-clerkship, four offered concurrent clinical and research training, and three offered alternative structures. Nine held seminars exposing students to clinical and research integration and two offered clinician scientist skills courses. Stipend funding and tuition varied, especially during clinical training years. Regarding mentorship, all programs held regular meetings, though eight programs do not have formal mentorship opportunities. Both trainees and program directors identified the need for further career planning and development support as a student priority.
MD/PhD programs varied by program structure, funding, tuition and mentorship opportunities. Mechanisms to share and spread program innovations should be instated. Students may benefit from concurrent research and clinical training as well as courses specific to clinician scientist skill development. Decreasing debt burden may attract and retain trainees in this demanding path. To ensure mentorship programs align with trainee priorities, program directors should directly collaborate with students in their development and evaluation.
加拿大对临床医生科学家培训的研究有限,特别是在培训整合和资金方面。本研究评估了加拿大医学博士/哲学博士项目的课程结构、资金、学费和导师指导结构。
加拿大临床研究学员协会对当前学员和项目主任进行了一项匿名调查,涵盖了各机构的课程结构、学员资金、学费以及导师指导机会和需求。
2015年6月,101/228(44%)名学员和9/13(69%)名项目主任完成了在线调查。在所有项目中,学生在临床实习培训之前完成哲学博士学位。七个项目在临床实习前提供研究培训,四个项目提供临床和研究并行培训,三个项目提供其他结构。九个项目举办研讨会,让学生接触临床和研究整合,两个项目提供临床医生科学家技能课程。助学金资金和学费各不相同,尤其是在临床培训期间。关于导师指导,所有项目都定期举行会议,不过有八个项目没有正式的导师指导机会。学员和项目主任都认为,作为学生的优先事项,需要进一步的职业规划和发展支持。
医学博士/哲学博士项目在课程结构、资金、学费和导师指导机会方面各不相同。应建立分享和推广项目创新的机制。学生可能会从临床和研究并行培训以及临床医生科学家技能发展的特定课程中受益。减轻债务负担可能会吸引和留住选择这条高要求道路的学员。为确保导师指导项目符合学员的优先事项,项目主任应在学员的发展和评估中与学生直接合作。