Vaughn Amber E, Dearth-Wesley Tracy, Tabak Rachel G, Bryant Maria, Ward Dianne S
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Feb;117(2):214-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
Parents' food parenting practices influence children's dietary intake and risk for obesity and chronic disease. Understanding the influence and interactions between parents' practices and children's behavior is limited by a lack of development and psychometric testing and/or limited scope of current measures. The Home Self-Administered Tool for Environmental Assessment of Activity and Diet (HomeSTEAD) was created to address this gap.
This article describes development and psychometric testing of the HomeSTEAD family food practices survey.
PARTICIPANTS/DESIGN: Between August 2010 and May 2011, a convenience sample of 129 parents of children aged 3 to 12 years were recruited from central North Carolina and completed the self-administered HomeSTEAD survey on three occasions during a 12- to 18-day window. Demographic characteristics and child diet were assessed at Time 1. Child height and weight were measured during the in-home observations (following Time 1 survey).
Exploratory factor analysis with Time 1 data was used to identify potential scales. Scales with more than three items were examined for scale reduction. Following this, mean scores were calculated at each time point. Construct validity was assessed by examining Spearman rank correlations between mean scores (Time 1) and children's diet (fruits and vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages, snacks, sweets) and body mass index (BMI) z scores. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine differences in mean scores between time points, and single-measure intraclass correlations were calculated to examine test-retest reliability between time points.
Exploratory factor analysis identified 24 factors and retained 124 items; however, scale reduction narrowed items to 86. The final instrument captures five coercive control practices (16 items), seven autonomy support practices (24 items), and 12 structure practices (46 items). All scales demonstrated good internal reliability (α>.62), 18 factors demonstrated construct validity (significant association with child diet, P<0.05), and 22 demonstrated good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient>0.61).
The HomeSTEAD family food practices survey provides a brief, yet comprehensive and psychometrically sound assessment of food parenting practices.
父母的食物养育方式会影响孩子的饮食摄入以及肥胖和慢性病风险。由于缺乏相关开发和心理测量测试,以及当前测量方法的范围有限,对于父母养育方式与孩子行为之间的影响和相互作用的理解受到限制。家庭活动与饮食环境自我评估工具(HomeSTEAD)的创建就是为了填补这一空白。
本文描述了HomeSTEAD家庭食物养育方式调查的开发和心理测量测试。
参与者/设计:2010年8月至2011年5月期间,从北卡罗来纳州中部招募了129名3至12岁孩子的父母作为便利样本,并在12至18天的时间段内分三次完成了自我管理的HomeSTEAD调查。在时间1评估了人口统计学特征和孩子的饮食情况。在家庭观察期间(时间1调查之后)测量了孩子的身高和体重。
使用时间1的数据进行探索性因素分析以确定潜在的量表。对项目数超过三个的量表进行量表缩减检查。在此之后,计算每个时间点的平均得分。通过检查平均得分(时间1)与孩子的饮食(水果和蔬菜、含糖饮料、零食、甜食)和体重指数(BMI)z分数之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关性来评估结构效度。使用重复测量方差分析来检查时间点之间平均得分的差异,并计算单测量组内相关性以检查时间点之间的重测信度。
探索性因素分析确定了24个因素并保留了124个项目;然而,量表缩减将项目减少到86个。最终工具涵盖了五种强制控制方式(16个项目)、七种自主支持方式(24个项目)和12种结构化方式(46个项目)。所有量表都显示出良好的内部信度(α>.62),18个因素显示出结构效度(与孩子饮食有显著关联,P<0.05),22个显示出良好的信度(组内相关系数>0.61)。
HomeSTEAD家庭食物养育方式调查提供了一种对食物养育方式的简短、全面且心理测量合理的评估。