Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术后疼痛的腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞:一项随机对照试验

Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Blanco Rafael, Ansari Tarek, Riad Waleed, Shetty Nanda

机构信息

From the Anaesthetic Department, Corniche Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):757-762. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000495.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Effective postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery enhances early recovery, ambulation, and breastfeeding. In a previous study, we established the effectiveness of the quadratus lumborum block in providing pain relief after cesarean delivery compared with patient-controlled analgesia (morphine). In the current study, we hypothesized that this method would be equal to or better than the transversus abdominis plane block with regard to pain relief and its duration of action after cesarean delivery.

METHODS

Between April 2015 and August 2015, we randomized 76 patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia to receive the quadratus lumborum block or the transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain relief. This trial was registered prospectively (NCT 02489851) [corrected].

RESULTS

Patients in the quadratus lumborum block group used significantly less morphine than the transversus abdominis plane block group (P < 0.05) at 12, 24, and 48 hours but not at 4 and 6 hours after cesarean delivery. This group also had significantly fewer morphine demands than the control group (P < 0.05) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean delivery. No significant differences in visual analog scale results were shown between the 2 groups at rest or with movement. Calculated total pain relief at rest and with movement were similar (P < 0.001) in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The quadratus lumborum block was more effective in reducing morphine consumption and demands than transversus abdominis plane blocks after cesarean section. This effect was observed up to 48 hours postoperatively.

摘要

背景与目的

剖宫产术后有效的镇痛可促进早期恢复、下床活动及母乳喂养。在之前的一项研究中,我们证实了与患者自控镇痛(吗啡)相比,腰方肌阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛中的有效性。在本研究中,我们假设在剖宫产术后的疼痛缓解及其作用持续时间方面,该方法等同于或优于腹横肌平面阻滞。

方法

2015年4月至2015年8月期间,我们将76例计划在腰麻下行择期剖宫产的患者随机分为两组,分别接受腰方肌阻滞或腹横肌平面阻滞以缓解术后疼痛。该试验已进行前瞻性注册(NCT 02489851)[已校正]。

结果

剖宫产术后12、24和48小时,腰方肌阻滞组患者使用的吗啡量显著少于腹横肌平面阻滞组(P<0.05),但在术后4和6小时两组无差异。该组在剖宫产术后6、12、24和48小时对吗啡的需求量也显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。两组在静息或活动时视觉模拟量表结果无显著差异。两组静息和活动时计算得出的总疼痛缓解程度相似(P<0.001)。

结论

剖宫产术后,腰方肌阻滞在减少吗啡用量和需求量方面比腹横肌平面阻滞更有效。这种效果在术后48小时内均可见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验