Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验中早期耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)治疗对囊性纤维化患者的微生物学疗效

Microbiological efficacy of early MRSA treatment in cystic fibrosis in a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Muhlebach Marianne Sponer, Beckett Valeria, Popowitch Elena, Miller Melissa B, Baines Arthur, Mayer-Hamblett Nicole, Zemanick Edith T, Hoover Wynton C, VanDalfsen Jill M, Campbell Preston, Goss Christopher H

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Thorax. 2017 Apr;72(4):318-326. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208949. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate microbiological effectiveness, that is, culture negativity of a non-blinded eradication protocol (Rx) compared with observation (Obs) in clinically stable cystic fibrosis participants with newly positive methicillin resistant (MRSA) cultures.

DESIGN

This non-blinded trial randomised participants ages 4-45 years with first or early (≤2 positive cultures within 3 years) MRSA-positive culture without MRSA-active antibiotics within 4 weeks 1:1 to Rx or Obs. The Rx protocol was: oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or if sulfa-allergic, minocycline plus oral rifampin; chlorhexidine mouthwash for 2 weeks; nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine body wipes for 5 days and environmental decontamination for 21 days. The primary end point was MRSA culture status at day 28.

RESULTS

Between 1 April 2011 to September 2014, 45 participants (44% female, mean age 11.5 years) were randomised (24 Rx, 21 Obs). At day 28, 82% (n=18/22) of participants in the Rx arm compared with 26% (n=5/19) in the Obs arm were MRSA-negative. Adjusted for interim monitoring, this difference was 52% (95% CI 23% to 80%, p<0.001). Limiting analyses to participants who were MRSA-positive at the screening visit, 67% (8/12) in the Rx arm and 13% (2/15) in the Obs arm were MRSA-negative at day 28, adjusted difference: 49% (95% CI 22% to 71%, p<0.001). Fifty-four per cent in the Rx arm compared with 10% participants in the Obs arm remained MRSA-negative through day 84. Mild gastrointestinal side effects were higher in the Rx arm.

CONCLUSIONS

This MRSA eradication protocol for newly acquired MRSA demonstrated microbiological efficacy with a large treatment effect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01349192.

摘要

目的

评估在临床症状稳定、新出现耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)培养阳性的囊性纤维化患者中,与观察(Obs)相比,非盲法根除方案(Rx)的微生物学疗效,即培养转阴情况。

设计

这项非盲法试验将年龄在4至45岁、首次或早期(3年内≤2次培养阳性)MRSA培养阳性且在4周内未使用过MRSA活性抗生素的患者按1:1随机分为Rx组或Obs组。Rx方案为:口服甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑,若对磺胺过敏,则使用米诺环素加口服利福平;洗必泰漱口水使用2周;鼻用莫匹罗星和洗必泰擦身巾使用5天,环境去污21天。主要终点为第28天的MRSA培养状态。

结果

2011年4月1日至2014年9月期间,45名患者(44%为女性,平均年龄11.5岁)被随机分组(24名Rx组,21名Obs组)。在第28天,Rx组82%(n = 18/22)的患者MRSA培养转阴,而Obs组为26%(n = 5/19)。经中期监测调整后,差异为52%(95%置信区间23%至80%,p<0.001)。将分析限制在筛查访视时MRSA阳性的患者,Rx组67%(8/12)的患者在第28天MRSA培养转阴,Obs组为13%(2/15),调整后的差异为49%(95%置信区间22%至71%,p<0.001)。Rx组54%的患者至第84天仍保持MRSA培养转阴,而Obs组为10%。Rx组轻度胃肠道副作用发生率更高。

结论

这种针对新获得的MRSA的根除方案显示出微生物学疗效,且治疗效果显著。

试验注册号

NCT01349192。

相似文献

1
Microbiological efficacy of early MRSA treatment in cystic fibrosis in a randomised controlled trial.
Thorax. 2017 Apr;72(4):318-326. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208949. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
2
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 21;7(7):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub4.
3
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub5.
7
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus eradication in cystic fibrosis patients: A randomized multicenter study.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0213497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213497. eCollection 2019.
8
Decolonization to Reduce Postdischarge Infection Risk among MRSA Carriers.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):638-650. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716771.

引用本文的文献

2
Antibiotic treatment of bacterial lung infections in cystic fibrosis.
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 14;184(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05905-9.
3
Cystic fibrosis.
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Aug 8;10(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00538-6.
4
Advances in the Cystic Fibrosis Drug Development Pipeline.
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;13(9):1835. doi: 10.3390/life13091835.
6
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub5.
7
Eradication of early MRSA infection in cystic fibrosis: a novel study design for the STAR-ter trial.
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Dec 5;8(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00190-2022. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Drugs, Drugs, Drugs: Current Treatment Paradigms in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Infections.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2022 Sep 7;11(Supplement_2):S32-S39. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piac061.
10
Cystic Fibrosis: Recent Insights into Inhaled Antibiotic Treatment and Future Perspectives.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Mar 22;10(3):338. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030338.

本文引用的文献

2
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 24(2):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub3.
3
Short-term and long-term response to pulmonary exacerbation treatment in cystic fibrosis.
Thorax. 2016 Mar;71(3):223-9. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206750. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular typing of MRSA in cystic fibrosis.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Mar;49(3):230-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22815. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
The economic burden of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA).
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Jun;19(6):528-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03914.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
8
Review: Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA in cystic fibrosis.
J Cyst Fibros. 2011 Sep;10(5):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
9
Treatment intensity and characteristics of MRSA infection in CF.
J Cyst Fibros. 2011 May;10(3):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验