Muhlebach Marianne Sponer, Beckett Valeria, Popowitch Elena, Miller Melissa B, Baines Arthur, Mayer-Hamblett Nicole, Zemanick Edith T, Hoover Wynton C, VanDalfsen Jill M, Campbell Preston, Goss Christopher H
Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Thorax. 2017 Apr;72(4):318-326. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208949. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
To evaluate microbiological effectiveness, that is, culture negativity of a non-blinded eradication protocol (Rx) compared with observation (Obs) in clinically stable cystic fibrosis participants with newly positive methicillin resistant (MRSA) cultures.
This non-blinded trial randomised participants ages 4-45 years with first or early (≤2 positive cultures within 3 years) MRSA-positive culture without MRSA-active antibiotics within 4 weeks 1:1 to Rx or Obs. The Rx protocol was: oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or if sulfa-allergic, minocycline plus oral rifampin; chlorhexidine mouthwash for 2 weeks; nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine body wipes for 5 days and environmental decontamination for 21 days. The primary end point was MRSA culture status at day 28.
Between 1 April 2011 to September 2014, 45 participants (44% female, mean age 11.5 years) were randomised (24 Rx, 21 Obs). At day 28, 82% (n=18/22) of participants in the Rx arm compared with 26% (n=5/19) in the Obs arm were MRSA-negative. Adjusted for interim monitoring, this difference was 52% (95% CI 23% to 80%, p<0.001). Limiting analyses to participants who were MRSA-positive at the screening visit, 67% (8/12) in the Rx arm and 13% (2/15) in the Obs arm were MRSA-negative at day 28, adjusted difference: 49% (95% CI 22% to 71%, p<0.001). Fifty-four per cent in the Rx arm compared with 10% participants in the Obs arm remained MRSA-negative through day 84. Mild gastrointestinal side effects were higher in the Rx arm.
This MRSA eradication protocol for newly acquired MRSA demonstrated microbiological efficacy with a large treatment effect.
NCT01349192.
评估在临床症状稳定、新出现耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)培养阳性的囊性纤维化患者中,与观察(Obs)相比,非盲法根除方案(Rx)的微生物学疗效,即培养转阴情况。
这项非盲法试验将年龄在4至45岁、首次或早期(3年内≤2次培养阳性)MRSA培养阳性且在4周内未使用过MRSA活性抗生素的患者按1:1随机分为Rx组或Obs组。Rx方案为:口服甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑,若对磺胺过敏,则使用米诺环素加口服利福平;洗必泰漱口水使用2周;鼻用莫匹罗星和洗必泰擦身巾使用5天,环境去污21天。主要终点为第28天的MRSA培养状态。
2011年4月1日至2014年9月期间,45名患者(44%为女性,平均年龄11.5岁)被随机分组(24名Rx组,21名Obs组)。在第28天,Rx组82%(n = 18/22)的患者MRSA培养转阴,而Obs组为26%(n = 5/19)。经中期监测调整后,差异为52%(95%置信区间23%至80%,p<0.001)。将分析限制在筛查访视时MRSA阳性的患者,Rx组67%(8/12)的患者在第28天MRSA培养转阴,Obs组为13%(2/15),调整后的差异为49%(95%置信区间22%至71%,p<0.001)。Rx组54%的患者至第84天仍保持MRSA培养转阴,而Obs组为10%。Rx组轻度胃肠道副作用发生率更高。
这种针对新获得的MRSA的根除方案显示出微生物学疗效,且治疗效果显著。
NCT01349192。