Suppr超能文献

荷兰孕妇沙眼衣原体筛查的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in Dutch pregnant women.

机构信息

a Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.

b Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pathog Glob Health. 2016 Oct-Dec;110(7-8):292-302. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2016.1258162.

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis infections during pregnancy may have serious consequences for women and their offspring. Chlamydial infections are largely asymptomatic. Hence, prevention is based on screening. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of C. trachomatis screening during pregnancy. We used a health-economic decision analysis model, which included potential health outcomes of C. trachomatis infection for women, partners and infants, and premature delivery. We estimated the cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective using recent prevalence data from a population-based prospective cohort study among pregnant women in the Netherlands. We calculated the averted costs by linking health outcomes with health care costs and productivity losses. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as net costs per major outcome prevented and was estimated in base-case analysis, sensitivity, and scenario analysis. In the base-case analysis, the costs to detect 1000 pregnant women with C. trachomatis were estimated at €527,900. Prevention of adverse health outcomes averted €626,800 in medical costs, resulting in net cost savings. Sensitivity analysis showed that net cost savings remained with test costs up to €22 (test price €19) for a broad range of variation in underlying assumptions. Scenario analysis showed even more cost savings with targeted screening for women less than 30 years of age or with first pregnancies only. Antenatal screening for C. trachomatis is a cost-saving intervention when testing all pregnant women in the Netherlands. Savings increase even further when testing women younger than 30 years of age or with pregnancies only.

摘要

沙眼衣原体感染孕妇可能会对女性及其后代产生严重后果。沙眼衣原体感染大多无症状。因此,预防主要基于筛查。本研究旨在评估妊娠期间筛查沙眼衣原体的成本效益。我们使用了一种健康经济学决策分析模型,该模型包括了沙眼衣原体感染对女性、伴侣和婴儿的潜在健康后果,以及早产。我们从社会角度使用了一项基于荷兰孕妇的人群前瞻性队列研究的最新患病率数据来估算成本效益。我们通过将健康结果与医疗保健成本和生产力损失联系起来,来估算避免的成本。成本效益以每预防一个主要结局的净成本表示,并在基础案例分析、敏感性分析和情景分析中进行了估算。在基础案例分析中,检测 1000 名沙眼衣原体感染孕妇的成本估计为 527900 欧元。预防医疗费用中因不良健康后果而避免的成本为 626800 欧元,从而实现了净成本节约。敏感性分析表明,在各种基础假设发生广泛变化的情况下,只要检测成本在 22 欧元以内(检测价格为 19 欧元),就可以实现净成本节约。情景分析表明,对于年龄小于 30 岁或仅首次怀孕的女性进行有针对性的筛查,还可以节省更多成本。在荷兰对所有孕妇进行沙眼衣原体筛查是一项节省成本的干预措施。当对年龄小于 30 岁或仅怀孕的女性进行检测时,节省的成本会进一步增加。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in Dutch pregnant women.
Pathog Glob Health. 2016 Oct-Dec;110(7-8):292-302. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2016.1258162.
8
Chlamydia screening for pregnant women aged 16-25 years attending an antenatal service: a cost-effectiveness study.
BJOG. 2016 Jun;123(7):1194-202. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13567. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
9
Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in women 15 to 29 years of age: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):501-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00006.
10
The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland.
Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Apr;88(3):222-8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050067. Epub 2012 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal-fetal transfer and longitudinal trends of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium in early childhood.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jul;104(7):1366-1372. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15105. Epub 2025 May 12.
2
Acceptability, feasibility, equity and resource use for prenatal screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: A systematic review.
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2024 Jul 24;50(7-8):250-258. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v50i78a03. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
4
5
Evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis screening from the perspective of health economics: a systematic review.
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;11:1212890. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1212890. eCollection 2023.
8
Prevalence of Among Pregnant Women, Gynecology Clinic Attendees, and Subfertile Women in Guangdong, China: A Cross-sectional Survey.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 24;8(6):ofab206. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab206. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Screening and Treatment in Pregnancy to Reduce Adverse Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes: A Review.
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;9:531073. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.531073. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis.
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(22):1-250. doi: 10.3310/hta20220.
3
Chlamydia screening for pregnant women aged 16-25 years attending an antenatal service: a cost-effectiveness study.
BJOG. 2016 Jun;123(7):1194-202. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13567. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
4
The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland.
Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Apr;88(3):222-8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050067. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
5
Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy associated with preterm delivery: a population-based prospective cohort study.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;26(6):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9586-1. Epub 2011 May 3.
6
Chlamydia trachomatis and placental inflammation in early preterm delivery.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 May;26(5):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9569-2. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
8
Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a case-control study.
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Jul;20(7):465-9. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008388.
9
The Generation R Study: design and cohort update until the age of 4 years.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(12):801-11. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9309-4. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
10
Cost-utility of repeated screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):272-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00225.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验