Suppr超能文献

对数字行为改变干预措施参与度的概念化:一项运用批判性解释性综合原则的系统评价

Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.

作者信息

Perski Olga, Blandford Ann, West Robert, Michie Susan

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, 66-72 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6EA, UK.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1.

Abstract

"Engagement" with digital behaviour change interventions (DBCIs) is considered important for their effectiveness. Evaluating engagement is therefore a priority; however, a shared understanding of how to usefully conceptualise engagement is lacking. This review aimed to synthesise literature on engagement to identify key conceptualisations and to develop an integrative conceptual framework involving potential direct and indirect influences on engagement and relationships between engagement and intervention effectiveness. Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ISI Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect) were searched in November 2015. We identified 117 articles that met the inclusion criteria: studies employing experimental or non-experimental designs with adult participants explicitly or implicitly referring to engagement with DBCIs, digital games or technology. Data were synthesised using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Engagement with DBCIs is conceptualised in terms of both experiential and behavioural aspects. A conceptual framework is proposed in which engagement with a DBCI is influenced by the DBCI itself (content and delivery), the context (the setting in which the DBCI is used and the population using it) and the behaviour that the DBCI is targeting. The context and "mechanisms of action" may moderate the influence of the DBCI on engagement. Engagement, in turn, moderates the influence of the DBCI on those mechanisms of action. In the research literature, engagement with DBCIs has been conceptualised in terms of both experience and behaviour and sits within a complex system involving the DBCI, the context of use, the mechanisms of action of the DBCI and the target behaviour.

摘要

对于数字行为改变干预措施(DBCIs)而言,“参与度”被认为对其有效性至关重要。因此,评估参与度是一项优先任务;然而,目前缺乏对如何有效概念化参与度的共同理解。本综述旨在综合有关参与度的文献,以确定关键的概念化方式,并构建一个综合概念框架,该框架涉及对参与度的潜在直接和间接影响以及参与度与干预效果之间的关系。2015年11月,我们检索了四个电子数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、PsycINFO、ISI Web of Knowledge、ScienceDirect)。我们确定了117篇符合纳入标准的文章:这些研究采用实验或非实验设计,成年参与者明确或隐含地提及了与DBCIs、数字游戏或技术的参与度。数据采用批判性解释性综合原则进行综合。对DBCIs的参与度从体验和行为两个方面进行概念化。我们提出了一个概念框架,其中对DBCI的参与度受到DBCI本身(内容和交付方式)、背景(使用DBCI的环境以及使用它的人群)以及DBCI所针对的行为的影响。背景和“作用机制”可能会调节DBCI对参与度的影响。反过来,参与度也会调节DBCI对那些作用机制的影响。在研究文献中,对DBCIs的参与度已从体验和行为两个方面进行了概念化,并且处于一个复杂的系统之中,该系统涉及DBCI、使用背景、DBCI的作用机制以及目标行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5526809/2474bc72761f/13142_2016_453_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验