Manley Geoffrey A
Cochlear and Auditory Brainstem Physiology, Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Research Centre Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.
Hear Res. 2017 Sep;352:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
The hearing organs of amniote vertebrates show large differences in their size and structure between the species' groups. In spite of this, their performance in terms of hearing sensitivity and the frequency selectivity of auditory-nerve units shows unexpectedly small differences. The only substantial difference is that therian, defined as live-bearing, mammalian groups are able to hear ultrasonic frequencies (above 15-20 kHz), whereas in contrast monotreme (egg laying) mammals and all non-mammalian amniotes cannot. This review compares the structure and physiology of the cochleae of the main groups and asks the question as to why the many structural differences seen in therian mammals arose, yet did not result in greater differences in physiology. The likely answers to this question are found in the history of the mammals during the Cretaceous period that ended 65 million years ago. During that period, the therian cochlea lost its lagenar macula, leading to a fall in endolymph calcium levels. This likely resulted in a small revolution and an auditory crisis that was compensated for by a subsequent series of structural and physiological adaptations. The end result was a system of equivalent performance to that independently evolved in other amniotes but with the additional - and of course "unforeseen" - advantage that ultrasonic-frequency responses became an available option. That option was not always availed of, but in most groups of therian mammals it did evolve and is used for communication and orientation based on improved sound localization, with micro-bats and toothed whales relying on it for prey capture.
羊膜动物脊椎动物的听觉器官在物种群体之间的大小和结构上存在很大差异。尽管如此,它们在听觉敏感度和听觉神经单元的频率选择性方面的表现却出人意料地差异很小。唯一显著的差异是,被定义为胎生的兽类哺乳动物群体能够听到超声波频率(高于15 - 20千赫兹),而相比之下,单孔目(卵生)哺乳动物和所有非哺乳动物的羊膜动物则不能。这篇综述比较了主要群体耳蜗的结构和生理学,并提出了一个问题,即为什么在兽类哺乳动物中看到的许多结构差异出现了,但却没有导致生理学上更大的差异。这个问题的可能答案可以在6500万年前结束的白垩纪时期哺乳动物的历史中找到。在那个时期,兽类耳蜗失去了瓶状囊斑,导致内淋巴钙水平下降。这可能引发了一场小变革和听觉危机,随后一系列的结构和生理适应对其进行了补偿。最终结果是一个与其他羊膜动物独立进化出的性能相当的系统,但还有一个额外的——当然也是“意外的”——优势,即超声波频率响应成为了一个可用选项。这个选项并非总是被利用,但在大多数兽类哺乳动物群体中它确实进化了,并被用于基于改善的声音定位进行交流和定向,微型蝙蝠和齿鲸依靠它来捕捉猎物。