Bradley Cathy J, Yabroff K Robin, Mariotto Angela B, Zeruto Christopher, Tran Quyen, Warren Joan L
Cathy J. Bradley, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; K. Robin Yabroff, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; Angela B. Mariotto, Quyen Tran, and Joan L. Warren, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Christopher Zeruto, Information Management Service, Beltsville, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):529-535. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4166. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
Purpose Multiple agents for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been approved in the past decade, but little is known about their use and associated spending and survival. Methods We used SEER-Medicare data for elderly patients with a new diagnosis of advanced-stage NSCLC and were treated with antineoplastic agents between 2000 and 2011 (N = 22,163). We estimated the adjusted percentage of patients who received each agent, days while on treatment, survival, and spending in the 12 months after diagnosis. Results During the 12-year study period, a marked shift in treatment occurred along with a rapid adoption of pemetrexed (39.2%), erlotinib (20.3%), and bevacizumab (18.9%) and a decline in paclitaxel (38.7%), gemcitabine (17.0%), and vinorelbine (5.7%; all P < .05). The average total days on therapy increased by 5 days (from 103 to 108 days). Patients who received bevacizumab, erlotinib, or pemetrexed had the longest treatment durations on average (approximately 146 days v 75 days for those who did not receive these agents). Approximately 44% of patients received antineoplastic agents in the last 30 days of life throughout the study period. Acute inpatient spending declined (from $29,376 to $23,731), whereas outpatient spending increased 23% (from $37,931 to $46,642). Median survival gains of 1.5 months were observed. Conclusion Considerable shifts in the treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC occurred along with modest gains in survival and total Medicare spending. More precise outcome information is needed to inform value-based treatment decisions for advanced-stage NSCLC.
目的 在过去十年中,多种用于晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的药物已获批准,但对于它们的使用情况、相关费用及生存情况却知之甚少。方法 我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医保数据,纳入2000年至2011年间新诊断为晚期NSCLC并接受抗肿瘤药物治疗的老年患者(N = 22,163)。我们估计了接受每种药物治疗的患者的校正百分比、治疗天数、生存率以及诊断后12个月内的费用。结果 在为期12年的研究期间,治疗发生了显著变化,培美曲塞(39.2%)、厄洛替尼(20.3%)和贝伐单抗(18.9%)迅速得到应用,而紫杉醇(38.7%)、吉西他滨(17.0%)和长春瑞滨(5.7%;所有P <.05)的使用则有所下降。平均总治疗天数增加了5天(从103天增至108天)。接受贝伐单抗、厄洛替尼或培美曲塞治疗的患者平均治疗持续时间最长(未接受这些药物的患者约为75天,而接受这些药物的患者约为146天)。在整个研究期间,约44%的患者在生命的最后30天接受了抗肿瘤药物治疗。急性住院费用下降(从29,376美元降至23,731美元),而门诊费用增加了23%(从37,931美元增至46,642美元)。观察到中位生存期延长了1.5个月。结论 晚期NSCLC的治疗发生了相当大的变化,同时生存期和医疗保险总支出有适度增加。需要更精确的结果信息来为晚期NSCLC基于价值的治疗决策提供依据。