Estcourt Lise J, Fortin Patricia M, Hopewell Sally, Trivella Marialena, Wang Winfred C
Haematology/Transfusion Medicine, NHS Blood and Transplant, Level 2, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 9BQ.
Systematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, OX3 9BQ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 17;1(1):CD003146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003146.pub3.
Sickle cell disease is one of the commonest severe monogenic disorders in the world, due to the inheritance of two abnormal haemoglobin (beta globin) genes. Sickle cell disease can cause severe pain, significant end-organ damage, pulmonary complications, and premature death. Stroke affects around 10% of children with sickle cell anaemia (HbSS). Chronic blood transfusions may reduce the risk of vaso-occlusion and stroke by diluting the proportion of sickled cells in the circulation.This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2002, and last updated in 2013.
To assess risks and benefits of chronic blood transfusion regimens in people with sickle cell disease for primary and secondary stroke prevention (excluding silent cerebral infarcts).
We searched for relevant trials in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the Transfusion Evidence Library (from 1980), and ongoing trial databases; all searches current to 04 April 2016.We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 25 April 2016.
Randomised controlled trials comparing red blood cell transfusions as prophylaxis for stroke in people with sickle cell disease to alternative or standard treatment. There were no restrictions by outcomes examined, language or publication status.
Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and the risk of bias and extracted data.
We included five trials (660 participants) published between 1998 and 2016. Four of these trials were terminated early. The vast majority of participants had the haemoglobin (Hb)SS form of sickle cell disease.Three trials compared regular red cell transfusions to standard care in primary prevention of stroke: two in children with no previous long-term transfusions; and one in children and adolescents on long-term transfusion.Two trials compared the drug hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) and phlebotomy to long-term transfusions and iron chelation therapy: one in primary prevention (children); and one in secondary prevention (children and adolescents).The quality of the evidence was very low to moderate across different outcomes according to GRADE methodology. This was due to the trials being at a high risk of bias due to lack of blinding, indirectness and imprecise outcome estimates. Red cell transfusions versus standard care Children with no previous long-term transfusionsLong-term transfusions probably reduce the incidence of clinical stroke in children with a higher risk of stroke (abnormal transcranial doppler velocities or previous history of silent cerebral infarct), risk ratio 0.12 (95% confidence interval 0.03 to 0.49) (two trials, 326 participants), moderate quality evidence.Long-term transfusions may: reduce the incidence of other sickle cell disease-related complications (acute chest syndrome, risk ratio 0.24 (95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.48)) (two trials, 326 participants); increase quality of life (difference estimate -0.54, 95% confidence interval -0.92 to -0.17) (one trial, 166 participants); but make little or no difference to IQ scores (least square mean: 1.7, standard error 95% confidence interval -1.1 to 4.4) (one trial, 166 participants), low quality evidence.We are very uncertain whether long-term transfusions: reduce the risk of transient ischaemic attacks, Peto odds ratio 0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 2.11) (two trials, 323 participants); have any effect on all-cause mortality, no deaths reported (two trials, 326 participants); or increase the risk of alloimmunisation, risk ratio 3.16 (95% confidence interval 0.18 to 57.17) (one trial, 121 participants), very low quality evidence. Children and adolescents with previous long-term transfusions (one trial, 79 participants)We are very uncertain whether continuing long-term transfusions reduces the incidence of: stroke, risk ratio 0.22 (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 4.35); or all-cause mortality, Peto odds ratio 8.00 (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 404.12), very low quality evidence.Several review outcomes were only reported in one trial arm (sickle cell disease-related complications, alloimmunisation, transient ischaemic attacks).The trial did not report neurological impairment, or quality of life. Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus red cell transfusions and chelationNeither trial reported on neurological impairment, alloimmunisation, or quality of life. Primary prevention, children (one trial, 121 participants)Switching to hydroxyurea and phlebotomy may have little or no effect on liver iron concentrations, mean difference -1.80 mg Fe/g dry-weight liver (95% confidence interval -5.16 to 1.56), low quality evidence.We are very uncertain whether switching to hydroxyurea and phlebotomy has any effect on: risk of stroke (no strokes); all-cause mortality (no deaths); transient ischaemic attacks, risk ratio 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 4.84); or other sickle cell disease-related complications (acute chest syndrome, risk ratio 2.03 (95% confidence interval 0.39 to 10.69)), very low quality evidence. Secondary prevention, children and adolescents (one trial, 133 participants)Switching to hydroxyurea and phlebotomy may: increase the risk of sickle cell disease-related serious adverse events, risk ratio 3.10 (95% confidence interval 1.42 to 6.75); but have little or no effect on median liver iron concentrations (hydroxyurea, 17.3 mg Fe/g dry-weight liver (interquartile range 10.0 to 30.6)); transfusion 17.3 mg Fe/g dry-weight liver (interquartile range 8.8 to 30.7), low quality evidence.We are very uncertain whether switching to hydroxyurea and phlebotomy: increases the risk of stroke, risk ratio 14.78 (95% confidence interval 0.86 to 253.66); or has any effect on all-cause mortality, Peto odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 15.92); or transient ischaemic attacks, risk ratio 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 1.74), very low quality evidence.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for managing adults, or children who do not have HbSS sickle cell disease.In children who are at higher risk of stroke and have not had previous long-term transfusions, there is moderate quality evidence that long-term red cell transfusions reduce the risk of stroke, and low quality evidence they also reduce the risk of other sickle cell disease-related complications.In primary and secondary prevention of stroke there is low quality evidence that switching to hydroxyurea with phlebotomy has little or no effect on the liver iron concentration.In secondary prevention of stroke there is low-quality evidence that switching to hydroxyurea with phlebotomy increases the risk of sickle cell disease-related events.All other evidence in this review is of very low quality.
镰状细胞病是世界上最常见的严重单基因疾病之一,由两个异常血红蛋白(β珠蛋白)基因遗传所致。镰状细胞病可导致严重疼痛、显著的终末器官损害、肺部并发症和过早死亡。中风影响约10%的镰状细胞贫血(HbSS)儿童。慢性输血可通过稀释循环中镰状细胞的比例降低血管阻塞和中风的风险。这是Cochrane系统评价的更新版,首次发表于2002年,上次更新于2013年。
评估慢性输血方案在镰状细胞病患者中预防原发性和继发性中风(不包括无症状脑梗死)的风险和益处。
我们在Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE(1946年起)、Embase(1974年起)、输血证据图书馆(1980年起)以及正在进行的试验数据库中检索相关试验;所有检索截至2016年4月4日。我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化和遗传性疾病组血红蛋白病试验注册库:2016年4月25日。
比较红细胞输血作为镰状细胞病患者中风预防措施与替代或标准治疗的随机对照试验。对所检查的结局、语言或发表状态没有限制。
两位作者独立评估试验的合格性和偏倚风险并提取数据。
我们纳入了1998年至2016年间发表的5项试验(660名参与者)。其中4项试验提前终止。绝大多数参与者患有HbSS型镰状细胞病。3项试验在中风的一级预防中比较了定期红细胞输血与标准治疗:2项针对此前未长期输血的儿童;1项针对长期输血的儿童和青少年。2项试验比较了药物羟基脲(羟基脲)和放血疗法与长期输血及铁螯合疗法:1项在一级预防(儿童)中;1项在二级预防(儿童和青少年)中。根据GRADE方法,不同结局的证据质量从极低到中等。这是由于试验因缺乏盲法、间接性和不精确的结局估计而存在较高的偏倚风险。红细胞输血与标准治疗 此前未长期输血的儿童 长期输血可能降低中风风险较高(经颅多普勒速度异常或有既往无症状脑梗死病史)的儿童临床中风的发生率,风险比0.12(95%置信区间0.03至0.49)(2项试验,326名参与者),中等质量证据。长期输血可能:降低其他镰状细胞病相关并发症的发生率(急性胸综合征,风险比0.24(95%置信区间0.12至0.48))(2项试验,326名参与者);提高生活质量(差异估计值-0.54,95%置信区间-0.92至-0.17)(1项试验,166名参与者);但对智商分数影响很小或无影响(最小二乘均值:1.7,标准误95%置信区间-1.1至4.4)(1项试验,166名参与者),低质量证据。我们非常不确定长期输血是否:降低短暂性脑缺血发作的风险,Peto比值比0.13(95%置信区间0.01至2.11)(2项试验,323名参与者);对全因死亡率有任何影响,未报告死亡(2项试验,326名参与者);或增加同种免疫的风险,风险比3.16(95%置信区间0.18至57.17)(1项试验,121名参与者),极低质量证据。 此前长期输血的儿童和青少年(1项试验,79名参与者) 我们非常不确定继续长期输血是否会降低:中风的发生率,风险比0.22(95%置信区间从0.01至4.35);或全因死亡率,Peto比值比8.00(95%置信区间0.16至404.12),极低质量证据。几个系统评价结局仅在一个试验组中报告(镰状细胞病相关并发症、同种免疫、短暂性脑缺血发作)。该试验未报告神经功能损害或生活质量。 羟基脲和放血疗法与红细胞输血和螯合疗法 两项试验均未报告神经功能损害、同种免疫或生活质量。 一级预防,儿童(1项试验,121名参与者) 改用羟基脲和放血疗法可能对肝脏铁浓度影响很小或无影响,平均差异-1.80mg Fe/g干重肝脏(95%置信区间-5.16至1.56),低质量证据。我们非常不确定改用羟基脲和放血疗法是否对以下方面有任何影响:中风风险(无中风发生);全因死亡率(无死亡);短暂性脑缺血发作,风险比1.02(95%置信区间0.21至4.84);或其他镰状细胞病相关并发症(急性胸综合征,风险比2.03(95%置信区间0.39至10.69)),极低质量证据。 二级预防,儿童和青少年(1项试验,133名参与者) 改用羟基脲和放血疗法可能:增加镰状细胞病相关严重不良事件的风险,风险比3.10(95%置信区间1.42至6.75);但对肝脏铁浓度中位数影响很小或无影响(羟基脲,17.3mg Fe/g干重肝脏(四分位间距10.0至30.6));输血17.3mg Fe/g干重肝脏(四分位间距8.8至30.7),低质量证据。我们非常不确定改用羟基脲和放血疗法是否:增加中风风险,风险比14.