Marder Stephen R, Galderisi Silvana
Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Semel Institute for Neuroscience at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):14-24. doi: 10.1002/wps.20385.
Negative symptoms have long been conceptualized as a core aspect of schizophrenia. They play a key role in the functional outcome of the disorder, and their management represents a significant unmet need. Improvements in definition, characterization, assessment instruments and experimental models are needed in order to foster research aimed at developing effective interventions. A consensus has recently been reached on the following aspects: a) five constructs should be considered as negative symptoms, i.e. blunted affect, alogia, anhedonia, asociality and avolition; b) for each construct, symptoms due to identifiable factors, such as medication effects, psychotic symptoms or depression, should be distinguished from those regarded as primary; c) the five constructs cluster in two factors, one including blunted affect and alogia and the other consisting of anhedonia, avolition and asociality. In this paper, for each construct, we report the current definition; highlight differences among the main assessment instruments; illustrate quantitative measures, if available, and their relationship with the evaluations based on rating scales; and describe correlates as well as experimental models. We conclude that: a) the assessment of the negative symptom dimension has recently improved, but even current expert consensus-based instruments diverge on several aspects; b) the use of objective measures might contribute to overcome uncertainties about the reliability of rating scales, but these measures require further investigation and validation; c) the boundaries with other illness components, in particular neurocognition and social cognition, are not well defined; and d) without further reducing the heterogeneity within the negative symptom dimension, attempts to develop successful interventions are likely to lead to great efforts paid back by small rewards.
长期以来,阴性症状一直被视为精神分裂症的一个核心方面。它们在该疾病的功能转归中起着关键作用,而对其进行管理是一个尚未得到满足的重大需求。为了推动旨在开发有效干预措施的研究,需要在定义、特征描述、评估工具和实验模型方面加以改进。最近在以下几个方面已达成共识:a)应将五种结构视为阴性症状,即情感迟钝、言语贫乏、快感缺失、社交退缩和意志缺乏;b)对于每种结构,应将可识别因素(如药物作用、精神病性症状或抑郁)所致的症状与那些被视为原发性的症状区分开来;c)这五种结构聚为两个因子,一个包括情感迟钝和言语贫乏,另一个由快感缺失、意志缺乏和社交退缩组成。在本文中,对于每种结构,我们报告了当前的定义;强调了主要评估工具之间的差异;说明了可用的定量测量方法及其与基于评定量表的评估之间的关系;并描述了相关因素以及实验模型。我们得出以下结论:a)阴性症状维度的评估最近有所改进,但即使是当前基于专家共识的工具在几个方面也存在分歧;b)使用客观测量方法可能有助于克服评定量表可靠性方面的不确定性,但这些测量方法需要进一步研究和验证;c)与其他疾病成分(特别是神经认知和社会认知)的界限尚未明确界定;d)如果不进一步减少阴性症状维度内的异质性,试图开发成功的干预措施可能会导致付出巨大努力却收获甚微。