Chang Anne B, Oppenheimer John J, Weinberger Miles M, Rubin Bruce K, Grant Cameron C, Weir Kelly, Irwin Richard S
Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia; Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia.
New Jersey Medical School, Pulmonary and Allergy Associates, Morristown, NJ.
Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):884-890. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
Wet or productive cough is common in children with chronic cough. We formulated recommendations based on systematic reviews related to the management of chronic wet cough in children (aged ≤ 14 years) based on two key questions: (1) how effective are antibiotics in improving the resolution of cough? If so, what antibiotic should be used and for how long? and (2) when should children be referred for further investigations?
We used the CHEST expert cough panel's protocol for systematic reviews and the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) methodologic guidelines and GRADE framework (the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Data from the systematic reviews in conjunction with patients' values and preferences and the clinical context were used to form recommendations. Delphi methodology was used to obtain consensus for the recommendations/suggestions made.
Combining data from the systematic reviews, we found high-quality evidence in children aged ≤ 14 years with chronic (> 4 weeks' duration) wet/productive cough that using appropriate antibiotics improves cough resolution, and further investigations (eg, flexible bronchoscopy, chest CT scans, immunity tests) should be undertaken when specific cough pointers (eg, digital clubbing) are present. When the wet cough does not improve following 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment, there is moderate-quality evidence that further investigations should be considered to look for an underlying disease. New recommendations include the recognition of the clinical diagnostic entity of protracted bacterial bronchitis.
Compared with the 2006 Cough Guidelines, there is now high-quality evidence for some, but not all, aspects of the management of chronic wet cough in specialist settings. However, further studies (particularly in primary health) are required.
湿性咳嗽或咳痰性咳嗽在慢性咳嗽儿童中很常见。我们基于与14岁及以下儿童慢性湿性咳嗽管理相关的系统评价,针对两个关键问题制定了建议:(1)抗生素在改善咳嗽缓解方面的效果如何?如果有效,应使用何种抗生素以及使用多长时间?(2)儿童何时应转诊进行进一步检查?
我们采用了美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)专家咳嗽小组的系统评价方案以及美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)的方法学指南和GRADE框架(推荐评估、制定与评价分级)。系统评价的数据结合患者的价值观、偏好和临床背景来形成建议。采用德尔菲法就所提出的建议/意见达成共识。
综合系统评价的数据,我们发现,在14岁及以下患有慢性(持续时间>4周)湿性/咳痰性咳嗽的儿童中,有高质量证据表明使用适当的抗生素可改善咳嗽缓解情况,并且当出现特定的咳嗽指征(如杵状指)时应进行进一步检查(如可弯曲支气管镜检查、胸部CT扫描、免疫测试)。当抗生素治疗4周后湿性咳嗽没有改善时,有中等质量证据表明应考虑进行进一步检查以寻找潜在疾病。新的建议包括认识迁延性细菌性支气管炎这一临床诊断实体。
与2006年咳嗽指南相比,现在有高质量证据支持专科环境下慢性湿性咳嗽管理的某些方面,但并非所有方面。然而,还需要进一步研究(特别是在初级卫生保健方面)。