Suppr超能文献

BRAF和TERT启动子共存突变对甲状腺乳头状癌不良临床结局的影响:一项荟萃分析

Effects of Coexistent BRAF and TERT Promoter Mutations on Poor Clinical Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Moon Shinje, Song Young Shin, Kim Ye An, Lim Jung Ah, Cho Sun Wook, Moon Jae Hoon, Hahn Seokyung, Park Do Joon, Park Young Joo

机构信息

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea.

2 Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center , Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2017 May;27(5):651-660. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0350. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The presence of a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation has been suggested as a potential prognostic marker for thyroid cancer, and a synergistic association with the BRAF mutation has been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to verify the role of this genetic duet in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).

METHODS

Studies of the association of BRAF and TERT promoter mutations with clinicopathologic features, recurrence, or PTC-related mortality were included from PubMed and Embase databases (inception to September 2016).

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible studies incorporating 4347 patients with PTC were included, and 283 (median 8.3%) of these patients had coexistent BRAF and TERT promoter mutations. The coexistence of the two mutations was far more strongly associated with high-risk clinicopathologic features than either mutation alone was, including advanced TNM stage (vs. BRAF: odds ratio [OR] = 4.19 [confidence interval (CI) 3.07-5.71]; vs. TERT: OR = 4.66 [CI 2.67-8.13]), extrathyroidal extension (vs. BRAF: OR = 3.1 [CI 2.2-4.37]; vs. TERT: OR = 5.66 [CI 3.02-10.6]), lymph node metastasis (vs. BRAF: OR = 1.59 [CI 1.16-2.17]; vs. TERT: OR = 2.03 [CI 1.22-3.38]), and distant metastasis (vs. BRAF: OR = 11.76 [CI 5.63-24.58]). The coexistence of the mutations showed the highest risk of recurrence (coexistence vs. no mutations: hazard ratio [HR] = 6.60 [CI 3.82-11.40]; BRAF vs. no mutations: HR = 1.31 [CI 0.49-3.46]; TERT vs. no mutations: HR = 3.38 [CI 0.85-13.35]). Moreover, PTC-related mortality was significantly higher with coexistent mutations than in the presence of BRAF alone (HR = 20.07 [CI 8.37-48.09]).

CONCLUSIONS

Coexistent BRAF and TERT promoter mutations have a synergistic effect on clinical outcomes in PTC, whereas each mutation alone has a modest effect. Therefore, molecular testing of BRAF and TERT promoter mutations together is useful in assessing risk stratification of PTC.

摘要

背景

端粒酶逆转录酶(TERT)启动子突变的存在已被认为是甲状腺癌的一种潜在预后标志物,并且已证实其与BRAF突变存在协同关联。本研究的目的是验证这一基因组合在乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)中的作用。

方法

从PubMed和Embase数据库(建库至2016年9月)纳入关于BRAF和TERT启动子突变与临床病理特征、复发或PTC相关死亡率之间关联的研究。

结果

纳入了13项符合条件的研究,共4347例PTC患者,其中283例(中位数8.3%)患者同时存在BRAF和TERT启动子突变。与单独任何一种突变相比,两种突变共存与高风险临床病理特征的关联更为密切,包括晚期TNM分期(与BRAF相比:比值比[OR]=4.19[置信区间(CI)3.07 - 5.71];与TERT相比:OR = 4.66[CI 2.67 - 8.13])、甲状腺外侵犯(与BRAF相比:OR = 3.1[CI 2.2 - 4.37];与TERT相比:OR = 5.66[CI 3.02 - 10.6])、淋巴结转移(与BRAF相比:OR = 1.59[CI 1.16 - 2.17];与TERT相比:OR = 2.03[CI 1.22 - 3.38])和远处转移(与BRAF相比:OR = 11.76[CI 5.63 - 24.58])。两种突变共存显示出最高的复发风险(共存与无突变相比:风险比[HR]=6.60[CI 3.82 - 11.40];BRAF与无突变相比:HR = 1.31[CI 0.49 - 3.46];TERT与无突变相比:HR = 3.38[CI 0.85 - 13.35])。此外,与单独存在BRAF相比,两种突变共存时PTC相关死亡率显著更高(HR = 20.07[CI 8.37 - 48.09])。

结论

BRAF和TERT启动子突变共存对PTC的临床结局具有协同作用,而单独每种突变的作用较小。因此,同时检测BRAF和TERT启动子突变对于评估PTC的风险分层是有用 的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验