Noordraven Ernst L, Wierdsma André I, Blanken Peter, Bloemendaal Anthony F T, Staring Anton B P, Mulder Cornelis L
Dual Diagnosis Center (CDP) Palier, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;4(3):199-207. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30045-7.
Provision of financial incentives is a promising intervention for improving adherence in patients taking antipsychotic medication. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of this intervention for improving adherence to antipsychotic depot medication in patients with psychotic disorders, irrespective of their previous compliance.
We did this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at three mental health-care institutions in secondary psychiatric care services in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years, had been diagnosed with schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder, had been prescribed antipsychotic depot medication or had an indication to start using depot medication, and were participating in outpatient treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via computer-generated randomisation with a block size of four, to receive 12 months of either treatment as usual plus a financial reward for each depot of medication received (€30 per month if fully compliant; intervention group) or treatment as usual alone (control group). Randomisation was stratified by treatment site and suspected prognostic factors: sex, comorbid substance-use disorder (absent vs present), and compliance with antipsychotic medication in the 4 months before baseline (<50% vs ≥50%). Patients, clinicians, interviewers, and research assistants were masked to group allocation before, but not after, group assignment. The primary outcome was the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), defined as the number of depots of antipsychotic medication received divided by the total number of depots of antipsychotic medication prescribed during the 12 month intervention period. Patients were followed up for 6 months, during which time no monetary rewards were offered for taking antipsychotic medication. We did analysis by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Nederlands Trial Register, number NTR2350.
Between May 21, 2010, and Oct 15, 2014, we randomly assigned 169 patients to the intervention group (n=84) or the control group (n=85). Primary outcome data were available for 155 (92%) patients. At baseline, the mean MPR was 76·0% (SD 28·2%) in the intervention group versus 77·9% (28·5%) in the control group. At 12 months, the mean MPR was higher in the intervention group (94·3% [SD 11·3%]) than in the control group (80·3% [19·1%]), with an adjusted difference of 14·9% (95% CI 8·9-20·9%; p<0·0001). This difference was maintained throughout the 6 month follow-up period: mean MPR of 86·6% (SD 22·2%) in the intervention group versus 76·0% (22·7%) in the control group (adjusted difference 6·5%, 95% CI 2·0-10·9; p=0·047).
Financial incentives are an effective way of improving adherence to antipsychotic depot medication among patients with psychotic disorders. Further research is needed to study the long-term effects of this intervention.
Dual Diagnosis Center.
提供经济激励是提高服用抗精神病药物患者依从性的一种有前景的干预措施。我们旨在评估这种干预措施对改善精神病性障碍患者使用长效抗精神病药物依从性的有效性,无论其既往依从情况如何。
我们在荷兰二级精神科护理服务的三家精神卫生保健机构开展了这项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。符合条件的患者年龄在18 - 65岁之间,被诊断为精神分裂症或其他精神病性障碍,已被处方长效抗精神病药物或有开始使用长效药物的指征,且正在接受门诊治疗。患者通过计算机生成的随机分组(每组4例)以1:1的比例随机分配,分别接受12个月的常规治疗加每次接受长效药物注射的经济奖励(若完全依从每月30欧元;干预组)或仅接受常规治疗(对照组)。随机分组按治疗地点和可疑预后因素进行分层:性别、共病物质使用障碍(无或有)以及基线前4个月内抗精神病药物的依从性(<50%或≥50%)。患者、临床医生、访员和研究助理在分组前对分组情况不知情,但分组后知晓。主要结局是药物持有率(MPR),定义为在12个月干预期内接受的长效抗精神病药物注射次数除以处方的长效抗精神病药物注射总次数。对患者随访6个月,在此期间服用抗精神病药物不提供金钱奖励。我们按意向性分析进行分析。本试验已在荷兰试验注册中心注册,注册号为NTR2350。
在2010年5月21日至2014年10月15日期间,我们将169例患者随机分配至干预组(n = 84)或对照组(n = 85)。155例(92%)患者有主要结局数据。基线时,干预组的平均MPR为76.0%(标准差28.2%),对照组为77.9%(28.5%)。12个月时,干预组的平均MPR(94.3% [标准差11.3%])高于对照组(80.3% [19.1%]),调整后的差异为14.9%(95%置信区间8.9 - 20.9%;p<0.0001)。在整个6个月的随访期内该差异持续存在:干预组的平均MPR为86.6%(标准差22.2%),对照组为76.0%(22.7%)(调整后的差异为6.5%,95%置信区间2.0 - 10.9%;p = 0.047)。
经济激励是提高精神病性障碍患者使用长效抗精神病药物依从性的有效方法。需要进一步研究该干预措施的长期效果。
双重诊断中心。