Martín Castellanos Ángel, Cabañas Armesilla María Dolores, Barca Durán Francisco Javier, Martín Castellanos Pedro, Gómez Barrado José Javier
Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Cardiovasculares. Universidad de Extremadura. Cáceres.
Nutr Hosp. 2017 Feb 1;34(1):88-95. doi: 10.20960/nh.982.
Background: Obesity is a coronary risk factor associated to myocardial infarction although waist to-hip-ratio has shown higher predictive power. Objective: The aim of this study was a Receiver Operating Characteristic anthropometric analysis in infarcted males to identify the strength of association for simple measurements, obesity and indicators such as, waist to-hip-ratios, waist to-height-ratios and conicity index. Methods:Case-control study of myocardial infarction in European males. One hundred and twelve cases and 112 controls aged 30-74 years were enrolled. We measured weight, height, waist circumference, umbilical waist circumference and hip circumference. We calculated various anthropometric indicators. We obtained the areas under the ROC curves, the odds ratio and correlations for measurements and anthropometric indicators. Results: Body mass index [AUC: 0.686, 95% CI (0.616-0.755); OR: 3.3], waist circumference [AUC: 0.734, 95% CI (0.668-0.800); OR: 5.7], height [AUC: 0.623, 95% CI (0.550-0.696); OR: 2.3], hip circumference [AUC: 0.555, 95% CI (0.479-0.631); OR: 1], waist to-hip-ratio [AUC: 0.796, 95% CI (0.737-0.855); OR: 9.9], umbilical waist to-hip-ratio [AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.729-0.847); OR: 5.5], umbilical waist to-height-ratio [AUC: 0.788, 95% CI (0.729-0.847); OR: 7.5], conicity index [AUC: 0.795; 95% CI (0.738-0.853); OR: 9]. The correlations for waist to-height-ratios and conicity index were strong (all r ≥ 0.85; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Waist and height are measurements of associated independent risk. Hip circumference does no show discriminatory power. Obesity and waist-ratios are associated to myocardial infarction with different strength. Between other indicators, general obesity is more weakly associated. Waist to-hip-ratios present the best ROC curves but it occur information bias of their predictive power of risk. Umbilical waist to-height-ratio and conicity index present high discriminatory power and the best anthropometric risk correlations that support its use for the identification of obesity as risk factor associated to myocardial infarction and in all strategies for coronary health promotion.
肥胖是与心肌梗死相关的冠状动脉危险因素,尽管腰臀比已显示出更高的预测能力。目的:本研究旨在对心肌梗死男性患者进行接受者操作特征(ROC)人体测量分析,以确定简单测量指标、肥胖以及腰臀比、腰高比和锥度指数等指标之间的关联强度。方法:对欧洲男性心肌梗死患者进行病例对照研究。纳入了112例年龄在30 - 74岁的病例和112例对照。我们测量了体重、身高、腰围、脐周腰围和臀围。我们计算了各种人体测量指标。我们获得了ROC曲线下面积、测量指标和人体测量指标的比值比及相关性。结果:体重指数[AUC:0.686,95%可信区间(0.616 - 0.755);比值比:3.3]、腰围[AUC:0.734,95%可信区间(0.668 - 0.800);比值比:5.7]、身高[AUC:0.623,95%可信区间(0.550 - 0.696);比值比:2.3]、臀围[AUC:0.555,95%可信区间(0.479 - 0.631);比值比:1]、腰臀比[AUC:0.796,95%可信区间(0.737 - 0.855);比值比:9.9]、脐周腰臀比[AUC:0.830,95%可信区间(0.729 - 0.847);比值比:5.5]、脐周腰高比[AUC:0.788,95%可信区间(0.729 - 0.847);比值比:7.5]、锥度指数[AUC:0.795;95%可信区间(0.738 - 0.853);比值比:9]。腰高比与锥度指数之间的相关性很强(所有r≥0.85;p<0.001)。结论:腰围和身高是相关的独立风险测量指标。臀围未显示出鉴别能力。肥胖和腰比值与心肌梗死的关联强度不同。在其他指标中,一般肥胖的关联性较弱。腰臀比呈现出最佳的ROC曲线,但其风险预测能力存在信息偏差。脐周腰高比和锥度指数具有较高的鉴别能力和最佳的人体测量风险相关性,支持将其用于识别与心肌梗死相关的肥胖风险因素以及所有冠状动脉健康促进策略中。