Bayraktar Ulas D, Milton Denái R, Shpall Elizabeth J, Rondon Gabriela, Price Kristen J, Champlin Richard E, Nates Joseph L
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jun;23(6):991-996. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
Outcomes of intensive care for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) patients remain poor. Better selection of critically ill Allo-SCT patients for intensive care may alleviate costs to the patients, families, and the health care system. We aimed to develop a prognostic index tailored for critically ill Allo-SCT patients as traditional instruments are of limited value in this setting. Six hundred fifty-six Allo-SCT patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2001 and 2010 were divided into training and test sets. Of the 3 multivariable regression models built to predict hospital mortality in the training set, the model with the largest area under receiver operating curve (AUC) in the test set was selected as the prognostic index for intensive care after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PICAT). The parameters included in the regression model with the highest AUC (.81) were time to ICU from hospital admission, lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin, albumin, reason for ICU admission, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, conditioning intensity, age, and comorbidity score. AUC for hospital mortality of PICAT (.80) was significantly larger than that of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) (.61) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (.72) in all patients. Hospital mortality and median overall survival of patients with PICAT scores of 0 to 2 (n = 141), >2 to 4 (n = 242), and >4 (n = 182) were 34%, 69%, and 91%; and 7.59, .67, and .30 months, respectively. PICAT has good calibration and accuracy in predicting mortality for Allo-SCT patients requiring intensive care. Its AUC was significantly higher than APACHE II and SOFA scores and is also associated with overall survival.
异基因造血干细胞移植(Allo-SCT)患者的重症监护结局仍然较差。更好地选择需要重症监护的危重症Allo-SCT患者可能会减轻患者、家庭和医疗保健系统的负担。我们旨在开发一种针对危重症Allo-SCT患者的预后指数,因为传统工具在这种情况下价值有限。2001年至2010年间在MD安德森癌症中心重症监护病房(ICU)住院的656例Allo-SCT患者被分为训练集和测试集。在训练集中构建的用于预测医院死亡率的3个多变量回归模型中,选择在测试集中受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)最大的模型作为异基因造血干细胞移植后重症监护的预后指数(PICAT)。AUC最高(0.81)的回归模型中包含的参数有从入院到进入ICU的时间、乳酸脱氢酶、胆红素、白蛋白、进入ICU的原因、凝血酶原时间-国际标准化比值、预处理强度、年龄和合并症评分。在所有患者中,PICAT的医院死亡率AUC(0.80)显著大于急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)(0.61)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)(0.72)。PICAT评分为0至2(n = 141)、>2至4(n = 242)和>4(n = 182)的患者的医院死亡率和中位总生存期分别为34%、69%和91%;以及7.59个月、0.67个月和0.30个月。PICAT在预测需要重症监护的Allo-SCT患者死亡率方面具有良好的校准和准确性。其AUC显著高于APACHE II和SOFA评分,并且还与总生存期相关。