Suppr超能文献

[痴呆症精神无行为能力患者的书面预先安乐死指令:文献系统综述]

[Written advance euthanasia directives in mentally incompetent patients with dementia: a systematic review of the literature].

作者信息

de Nooijer K, van de Wetering V E, Geijteman E C T, Postma L, Rietjens J A C, van der Heide A

机构信息

Erasmus MC, afd. Maatschappelijke Gezondheidszorg, Rotterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D988.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present the knowledge, experiences and attitudes of the general population, patients, relatives and health care professionals concerning written advance euthanasia directives in patients who have become mentally incompetent.

DESIGN

Systematic review of the literature.

METHOD

We systematically searched Medline, Cochrane Library and Embase for articles published in the period 2002-2016.

RESULTS

The search yielded 775 articles, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. Six studies had a quantitative design, four studies had a qualitative design and one a combination of both. Nine articles included patients with advanced dementia, two included patients with Huntington's disease. Patients, their relatives and the general population appear to have limited knowledge about written advance euthanasia directives. However, most of them were open to the practice of euthanasia based on a written advance directive. Few persons and patients had written a euthanasia directive and if they had, it was not always discussed with health care professionals. The majority of health care professionals thought - incorrectly - that euthanasia based on a written advance euthanasia directive is not permitted. Some of them had a positive attitude towards written advance euthanasia directives, and a very small number would be prepared to carry out euthanasia on the basis of a written directive. In practice, there are very few who have actually done so.

CONCLUSION

There is fairly wide support from the general population and empathy from health care professionals for the idea that euthanasia based on a written advance euthanasia directive of a mentally incompetent patient should be possible. Even so, there is a discrepancy between the expectations of the general population and what health care professionals think they can actually do in this situation.

摘要

目的

呈现普通大众、患者、亲属及医护人员对于精神不健全患者的书面预先安乐死指示的认知、经验和态度。

设计

文献系统综述。

方法

我们系统检索了Medline、Cochrane图书馆和Embase,查找2002年至2016年期间发表的文章。

结果

检索得到775篇文章,其中11篇符合纳入标准。6项研究为定量设计,4项研究为定性设计,1项为两者结合。9篇文章纳入了晚期痴呆患者,2篇纳入了亨廷顿舞蹈症患者。患者、其亲属及普通大众对书面预先安乐死指示的了解似乎有限。然而,他们中的大多数人对基于书面预先指示的安乐死做法持开放态度。很少有人和患者撰写过安乐死指示,即便撰写了,也并非总是与医护人员进行讨论。大多数医护人员错误地认为基于书面预先安乐死指示的安乐死是不被允许的。他们中的一些人对书面预先安乐死指示持积极态度,极少数人会准备根据书面指示实施安乐死。在实践中,实际这样做的人极少。

结论

普通大众给予了相当广泛的支持,医护人员也表示认同,即基于精神不健全患者的书面预先安乐死指示实施安乐死应具有可行性。即便如此,普通大众的期望与医护人员认为在这种情况下实际能做的事情之间仍存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验