Yoo Su Jin, Kim Jae Hui, Lee Tae Gon, Kim Jong Woo, Cho Sung Won, Han Jung Il
Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;31(2):95-101. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.31.2.95. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
To evaluate the 3-month natural course of recurrent macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with intravitreal bevacizumab.
This retrospective, observational study included 36 eyes with macular edema secondary to BRVO. All patients were initially treated with intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema. Recurrence of macular edema was either not treated (untreated group) or treated with a single intravitreal bevacizumab injection (treated group). Central foveal thickness (CFT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared at the time of recurrence and 3 months later.
At the time of recurrence, the mean CFT and logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA were 484.9 ± 124.1 µm and 0.58 ± 0.26 in the untreated group (n = 19) and 456.3 ± 126.8 µm and 0.51 ± 0.21 in the treated group (n = 17), respectively. Three months later, the mean CFT and BCVA had changed to 493.7 ± 123.9 µm and 0.62 ± 0.29 in the untreated group and 294.7 ± 104.4 µm and 0.40 ± 0.24 in the treated group, respectively. The differences in CFT and BCVA between the two time points were not significant in the untreated group ( = 0.106 and = 0.687, respectively), whereas statistically significant differences were noted in the treated group ( = 0.002 and < 0.001, respectively).
Unlike the first episode of macular edema following BRVO, recurrent macular edema following intravitreal bevacizumab therapy did not spontaneously resolve, suggesting the potential benefit of prompt treatment.
评估玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)继发复发性黄斑水肿的3个月自然病程。
这项回顾性观察研究纳入了36例BRVO继发黄斑水肿的患者。所有患者最初均接受玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗黄斑水肿。黄斑水肿复发后,一部分患者未接受治疗(未治疗组),另一部分患者接受单次玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗(治疗组)。比较复发时及3个月后的中心凹厚度(CFT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。
复发时,未治疗组(n = 19)的平均CFT和最小分辨角对数视力分别为484.9±124.1 µm和0.58±0.26,治疗组(n = 17)分别为456.3±126.8 µm和0.51±0.21。3个月后,未治疗组的平均CFT和BCVA分别变为493.7±123.9 µm和0.62±0.29,治疗组分别变为294.7±104.4 µm和0.40±0.24。未治疗组两个时间点的CFT和BCVA差异无统计学意义(分别为 = 0.106和 = 0.687),而治疗组差异有统计学意义(分别为 = 0.002和 < 0.001)。
与BRVO后的首次黄斑水肿不同,玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗后的复发性黄斑水肿不会自发消退,提示及时治疗可能有益。