Suppr超能文献

伊布替尼、idelalisib 和 venetoclax 在慢性淋巴细胞白血病中的最佳序贯治疗:来自 683 例患者的多中心研究结果。

Optimal sequencing of ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from a multicenter study of 683 patients.

机构信息

Center for CLL, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1050-1056. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx031.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax are approved for treating CLL patients in the United States. However, there is no guidance as to their optimal sequence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of CLL patients treated with kinase inhibitors (KIs) or venetoclax. We examined demographics, discontinuation reasons, overall response rates (ORR), survival, and post-KI salvage strategies. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 683 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics were similar in the ibrutinib and idelalisib groups. ORR to ibrutinib and idelalisib as first KI was 69% and 81%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1-60), median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached. Patients treated with ibrutinib (versus idelalisib) as first KI had a significantly better PFS in all settings; front-line [hazard ratios (HR) 2.8, CI 1.3-6.3, P = 0.01], relapsed-refractory (HR 2.8, CI 1.9-4.1, P < 0.001), del17p (HR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.4, P = 0.008), and complex karyotype (HR 2.5, CI 1.2-5.2, P = 0.02). At the time of initial KI failure, use of an alternate KI or venetoclax had a superior PFS when compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Furthermore, patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to progression or toxicity had marginally improved outcomes if they received venetoclax (ORR 79%) versus idelalisib (ORR 46%) (PFS HR .6, CI.3-1.0, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest real-world experience of novel agents in CLL, ibrutinib appears superior to idelalisib as first KI. Furthermore, in the setting of KI failure, alternate KI or venetoclax therapy appear superior to chemoimmunotherapy combinations. The use of venetoclax upon ibrutinib failure might be superior to idelalisib. These data support the need for trials testing sequencing strategies to optimize treatment algorithms.

摘要

背景

伊布替尼、idelalisib 和 venetoclax 已获美国批准用于治疗 CLL 患者。然而,对于它们的最佳治疗顺序,目前尚无指导意见。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心、回顾性分析,纳入接受激酶抑制剂(KIs)或 venetoclax 治疗的 CLL 患者。我们检查了人口统计学、停药原因、总缓解率(ORR)、生存情况和 KI 后补救策略。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

共纳入 683 例患者。伊布替尼组和 idelalisib 组的基线特征相似。伊布替尼和 idelalisib 作为一线 KI 的 ORR 分别为 69%和 81%。中位随访时间为 17 个月(范围 1-60),全队列的中位 PFS 和 OS 均未达到。在所有情况下,一线接受伊布替尼(而非 idelalisib)治疗的患者 PFS 显著改善:一线治疗[风险比(HR)2.8,95%CI 1.3-6.3,P=0.01]、复发/难治性(HR 2.8,95%CI 1.9-4.1,P<0.001)、del17p(HR 2.0,95%CI 1.2-3.4,P=0.008)和复杂核型(HR 2.5,95%CI 1.2-5.2,P=0.02)。在初始 KI 失败时,与化疗免疫治疗相比,使用替代 KI 或 venetoclax 具有更好的 PFS。此外,由于进展或毒性而停用伊布替尼的患者,如果接受 venetoclax(ORR 79%)而非 idelalisib(ORR 46%),则其结局略有改善(PFS HR.6,95%CI.3-1.0,P=0.06)。

结论

在 CLL 新型药物的最大真实世界经验中,伊布替尼作为一线 KI 似乎优于 idelalisib。此外,在 KI 失败的情况下,替代 KI 或 venetoclax 治疗似乎优于化疗免疫治疗组合。伊布替尼治疗失败后使用 venetoclax 可能优于 idelalisib。这些数据支持需要进行临床试验来测试不同的治疗方案,以优化治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验