Hylands Mathieu, Moller Morten Hylander, Asfar Pierre, Toma Augustin, Frenette Anne Julie, Beaudoin Nicolas, Belley-Côté Émilie, D'Aragon Frédérick, Laake Jon Henrik, Siemieniuk Reed Alexander, Charbonney Emmanuel, Lauzier François, Kwong Joey, Rochwerg Bram, Vandvik Per Olav, Guyatt Gordon, Lamontagne François
Department of Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):703-715. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0877-1. Epub 2017 May 11.
Clinicians must balance the risks from hypotension with the potential adverse effects of vasopressors. Experts have recommended a mean arterial pressure (MAP) target of at least 65 mmHg, and higher in older patients and in patients with chronic hypertension or atherosclerosis. We conducted a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials comparing higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy administered to hypotensive critically ill patients.
We searched MEDLINE®, EMBASE™, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in critically ill hypotensive adult patients. Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility based on titles and abstracts, and they then selected full-text reports. Outcomes, subgroups, and analyses were prespecified. We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to rate the overall confidence in the estimates of intervention effects.
Of 8001 citations, we retrieved 57 full-text articles and ultimately included two randomized-controlled trials (894 patients). Higher blood pressure targets were not associated with lower mortality (relative risk [RR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.23; P = 0.54), and neither age (P = 0.17) nor chronic hypertension (P = 0.32) modified the overall effect. Nevertheless, higher blood pressure targets were associated with a greater risk of new-onset supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia (RR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.38; P < 0.01).
Current evidence does not support a MAP target > 70 mmHg in hypotensive critically ill adult patients requiring vasopressor therapy.
临床医生必须在低血压风险与血管升压药的潜在不良反应之间取得平衡。专家建议平均动脉压(MAP)目标至少为65 mmHg,老年患者以及患有慢性高血压或动脉粥样硬化的患者目标值更高。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统评价,比较了给予低血压危重症患者血管升压药治疗时较高血压目标与较低血压目标的效果。
我们检索了MEDLINE®、EMBASE™和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,以查找关于危重症低血压成年患者血管升压药治疗较高血压目标与较低血压目标的研究。两名评审员根据标题和摘要独立评估试验的合格性,然后选择全文报告。预先设定了结局、亚组和分析方法。我们使用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定和评价)对干预效果估计的总体可信度进行评级。
在8001篇文献中,我们检索到57篇全文文章,最终纳入两项随机对照试验(894例患者)。较高的血压目标与较低的死亡率无关(相对风险[RR],1.05;95%置信区间[CI],0.90至1.23;P = 0.54),年龄(P = 0.17)和慢性高血压(P = 0.32)均未改变总体效果。然而,较高的血压目标与新发室上性心律失常的风险增加有关(RR,2.08;95%CI,1.28至3.38;P < 0.01)。
目前的证据不支持在需要血管升压药治疗的低血压危重症成年患者中MAP目标>70 mmHg。