Suppr超能文献

羟氯喹在治疗原发性干燥综合征中是否有效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Is hydroxychloroquine effective in treating primary Sjogren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Shi-Qin, Zhang Li-Wei, Wei Pan, Hua Hong

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, 22 South Zhongguancun Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 12;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1543-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To systematically review and assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS).

METHODS

Five electronic databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of science, Ovid, Cochrane Library) were searched for randomized controlled trials and retrospective or prospective studies published in English that reported the effect of HCQ on pSS. The subjective symptoms (sicca symptoms, fatigue and pain) and the objective indexes (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and Schirmer test) were assessed as main outcome measures. A meta-analysis and descriptive study on the efficacy and safety of HCQ were conducted. The estimate of the effect of HCQ treatment was expressed as a proportion together with 95% confidence interval, and plotted on a forest plot.

RESULTS

Four trials with totals of 215 SS patients, including two randomized controlled trials, one double blind crossover trial and one retrospective open-label study, were analyzed in this review. For dry mouth and dry eyes, the effectiveness of HCQ treatment was essentially the same as placebo treatment. For fatigue, the effectiveness of HCQ was lower than placebo. The efficacy of HCQ in treating pain associated with pSS was superior to that of the placebo. There was no significant difference between HCQ-treated groups and controls in terms of Schirmer test results, but HCQ could reduce the erythrocyte sedimentation rate compare with placebo. A descriptive safety assessment showed that gastrointestinal adverse effects were the most common adverse effects associated with HCQ.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review showed that there is no significant difference between HCQ and placebo in the treatment of dry mouth and dry eye in pSS. Well-designed, randomized, controlled trials are needed to provide higher-quality evidence to confirm our findings, and future studies should focus on some other index or extraglandular measures, such as cutaneous manifestations, to further explore the therapeutic effect of HCQ in pSS.

摘要

背景

系统评价和评估羟氯喹(HCQ)治疗原发性干燥综合征(pSS)的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索五个电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、Ovid、Cochrane图书馆),查找以英文发表的随机对照试验以及回顾性或前瞻性研究,这些研究报告了HCQ对pSS的疗效。将主观症状(口干、眼干症状、疲劳和疼痛)和客观指标(红细胞沉降率和泪液分泌试验)作为主要结局指标进行评估。对HCQ的疗效和安全性进行荟萃分析和描述性研究。HCQ治疗效果的估计值以比例形式表示,并伴有95%置信区间,绘制在森林图上。

结果

本综述分析了四项试验,共215例干燥综合征患者,包括两项随机对照试验、一项双盲交叉试验和一项回顾性开放标签研究。对于口干和眼干,HCQ治疗的有效性与安慰剂治疗基本相同。对于疲劳,HCQ的有效性低于安慰剂。HCQ治疗与pSS相关疼痛的疗效优于安慰剂。HCQ治疗组和对照组在泪液分泌试验结果方面无显著差异,但与安慰剂相比,HCQ可降低红细胞沉降率。描述性安全性评估显示,胃肠道不良反应是与HCQ相关的最常见不良反应。

结论

本系统评价表明,在pSS患者的口干和眼干治疗中,HCQ与安慰剂之间无显著差异。需要设计良好的随机对照试验来提供更高质量的证据以证实我们的发现,未来的研究应关注其他一些指标或腺体外表现,如皮肤表现,以进一步探索HCQ在pSS中的治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfd/5427554/f46d9ea75916/12891_2017_1543_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验