Haskins Brianna L, Lesperance Donna, Gibbons Patric, Boudreaux Edwin D
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):292-299. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0492-2.
Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the USA. However, limited data exists regarding smoking cessation mobile app quality and intervention effectiveness. Innovative and scalable interventions are needed to further alleviate the public health implications of tobacco addiction. The proliferation of the smartphone and the advent of mobile phone health interventions have made treatment more accessible than ever. The purpose of this review was to examine the relation between published scientific literature and available commercial smartphone health apps for smoking cessation to identify the percentage of scientifically supported apps that were commercially available to consumers and to determine how many of the top commercially available apps for smoking cessation were supported by the published scientific literature. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, apps were reviewed in four phases: (1) identified apps from the scientific literature, (2) searched app stores for apps identified in the literature, (3) identified top apps available in leading app stores, and (4) determined which top apps available in stores had scientific support. Seven articles identified six apps with some level of scientific support, three (50%) were available in at least one app store. Conversely, among the top 50 apps suggested by each of the leading app stores, only two (4%) had any scientific support. While half of the scientifically vetted apps remain available to consumers, they are difficult to find among the many apps that are identified through app store searches.
在美国,吸烟是可预防疾病和死亡的首要原因。然而,关于戒烟移动应用程序的质量和干预效果的数据有限。需要创新且可扩展的干预措施来进一步减轻烟草成瘾对公共健康的影响。智能手机的普及以及手机健康干预措施的出现使治疗比以往任何时候都更容易获得。本综述的目的是研究已发表的科学文献与现有的商业智能手机戒烟应用程序之间的关系,以确定有科学依据的应用程序在市场上可供消费者使用的比例,并确定已发表的科学文献支持多少款排名靠前的商业戒烟应用程序。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对应用程序分四个阶段进行审查:(1)从科学文献中识别应用程序;(2)在应用商店中搜索文献中识别出的应用程序;(3)确定领先应用商店中可用的顶级应用程序;(4)确定商店中哪些顶级应用程序有科学支持。七篇文章识别出六个有一定科学支持水平的应用程序,其中三个(50%)至少在一个应用商店中可用。相反,在每个领先应用商店推荐的前50个应用程序中,只有两个(4%)有任何科学支持。虽然经过科学审查的应用程序中有一半仍然可供消费者使用,但在通过应用商店搜索识别出的众多应用程序中很难找到它们。