Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.
Clinical Research Office, Health Sciences Division, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3524-3531. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30719. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
The current study was conducted to compare the overall survival (OS) of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone in elderly patients (those aged ≥80 years) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Patients aged ≥80 years with cT2-4, N0-3, M0 transitional cell MIBC who were treated with curative RT (60-70 Gray) or CCRT were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Univariable and multivariable frailty survival analyses, as well as 1-to-1 propensity score matching, were used to isolate the association between CCRT and OS.
A total of 1369 patients who were treated with RT from 2004 through 2013 met eligibility criteria: 739 patients (54%) received RT alone and 630 patients (46%) received CCRT. The median age of the patients was 84 years (range, 80-90 years). The median follow-up was 21 months. The 2-year OS rate was 48%. When comparing CCRT with RT alone, the 2-year OS rate was 56% versus 42% (P<.0001), respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that CCRT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.65-0.84 [P<.0001]) and a higher RT dose (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90 [P<.001]) were associated with improved OS. T4 disease was associated with worse OS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.76 [P = .001]). After using 1-to-1 propensity score matching, there remained an OS benefit for the use of CCRT (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90 [P<.001]).
CCRT is associated with improved OS compared with the use of RT alone in elderly patients with MIBC, independent of Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, suggesting that CCRT should be used in this population. Cancer 2017;123:3524-31. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
本研究旨在比较同步放化疗(CCRT)与单纯放疗(RT)在肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)老年患者(≥80 岁)中的总生存期(OS)。
在国家癌症数据库中,确定了 2004 年至 2013 年期间接受根治性放疗(60-70 Gray)或 CCRT 治疗的 cT2-4、N0-3、M0 移行细胞 MIBC 且年龄≥80 岁的患者。采用单变量和多变量脆弱性生存分析以及 1:1 倾向评分匹配,以分离 CCRT 与 OS 之间的关联。
共有 1369 名患者符合 RT 治疗标准:739 名(54%)患者接受单纯 RT 治疗,630 名(46%)患者接受 CCRT 治疗。患者的中位年龄为 84 岁(范围 80-90 岁)。中位随访时间为 21 个月。2 年 OS 率为 48%。与单纯 RT 相比,CCRT 组 2 年 OS 率为 56% vs 42%(P<.0001)。多变量分析表明,CCRT(风险比[HR],0.74;95%置信区间[95%CI],0.65-0.84[P<.0001])和更高的 RT 剂量(HR,0.78;95%CI,0.67-0.90[P<.001])与 OS 改善相关。T4 疾病与较差的 OS 相关(HR,1.42;95%CI,1.15-1.76[P=0.001])。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配后,CCRT 的使用仍与 OS 获益相关(HR,0.77;95%CI,0.67-0.90[P<.001])。
CCRT 与 MIBC 老年患者单独使用 RT 相比,可改善 OS,与 Charlson-Deyo 合并症评分无关,提示该人群应使用 CCRT。癌症 2017;123:3524-31。©2017 美国癌症协会。