1Department of Health Promotion,NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism,Maastricht University Medical Centre,PO Box 616,Maastricht 6200,The Netherlands.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2355-2363. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001112. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
The high energy intake from energy-dense foods among children in developed countries is undesirable. Improving food parenting practices has the potential to lower snack intakes among children. To inform the development of interventions, we aimed to predict food parenting practice patterns around snacking (i.e. 'high covert control and rewarding', 'low covert control and non-rewarding', 'high involvement and supportive' and 'low involvement and indulgent').
A cross-sectional survey was conducted. To predict the patterns of food parenting practices, multinomial logistic regression analyses were run with 888 parents. Predictors included predisposing factors (i.e. parents' and children's demographics and BMI, parents' personality, general parenting, and parenting practices used by their own parents) and parents' cognitions (i.e. perceived behaviour of other parents, subjective norms, attitudes, self-efficacy and outcome expectations).
The Netherlands (October-November 2014).
Dutch parents of children aged 4-12 years old.
After backward elimination, nineteen factors had a statistically significant contribution to the model (Nagelkerke R 2=0·63). Overall, self-efficacy and outcome expectations were among the strongest explanatory factors. Considering the predisposing factors only, the general parenting factor nurturance most strongly predicted the food parenting clusters. Nurturance particularly distinguished highly involved parents from parents employing a pattern of low involvement.
Parental cognitions and nurturance are important factors to explain the use of food parenting practices around snacking. The results suggest that intervention developers should attempt to increase self-efficacy and educate parents about what constitute effective and ineffective parenting practices. Promoting nurturance might be a prerequisite to achieve prolonged change.
发达国家儿童摄入高热量的高能量食品是不可取的。改善食物养育实践有潜力降低儿童的零食摄入量。为了为干预措施的制定提供信息,我们旨在预测围绕零食的食物养育实践模式(即“高隐蔽控制和奖励”、“低隐蔽控制和非奖励”、“高参与和支持”和“低参与和放纵”)。
进行了一项横断面调查。为了预测食物养育实践模式,我们对 888 名父母进行了多项逻辑回归分析。预测因素包括倾向因素(即父母和孩子的人口统计学和 BMI、父母的个性、一般养育以及他们自己父母使用的养育实践)和父母的认知(即感知其他父母的行为、主观规范、态度、自我效能和结果期望)。
荷兰(2014 年 10 月至 11 月)。
4-12 岁儿童的荷兰父母。
经过向后消除,有 19 个因素对模型具有统计学意义(Nagelkerke R 2=0.63)。总体而言,自我效能和结果期望是最强的解释因素。仅考虑倾向因素,养育因素最能预测食物养育群体。养育特别区分了高度参与的父母和采用低度参与模式的父母。
父母的认知和养育是解释围绕零食使用食物养育实践的重要因素。结果表明,干预措施制定者应尝试提高自我效能,并教育父母什么是有效的和无效的养育实践。促进养育可能是实现持久改变的先决条件。