Rozalia Project, PO Box 75, Granville, VT 05747, USA.
College of Life and Environmental Sciences: Biosciences, Geoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Nov 15;124(1):245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.028. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
Aquatic environments are sinks for anthropogenic contamination, whether chemical or solid pollutants. Microfibers shed from clothing and other textiles contribute to this problem. These can be plastic or non-plastic origin. Our aim was to investigate the presence and distribution of both types of anthropogenic microfibers along the length of the Hudson River, USA. Surface grab samples were collected and filtered through a 0.45μm filter paper. Abundance of fibers was determined after subtraction of potential contamination. 233 microfibers were recorded in 142 samples, averaging 0.98microfibersL. Subsequent micro-FTIR showed half of the fibers were plastic while the other half were non-plastic, but of anthropogenic origin. There was no relationship between fiber abundance, wastewater treatment plant location or population density. Extrapolating from this data, and using available hydrographic data, 34.4% of the Hudson River's watershed drainage area contributes an average 300 million anthropogenic microfibers into the Atlantic Ocean per day.
水生环境是人为污染的汇,无论是化学污染还是固体污染物。衣物和其他纺织品脱落的微纤维加剧了这一问题。这些微纤维可能来自塑料或非塑料。我们的目的是调查美国哈德逊河沿程两种类型人为微纤维的存在和分布情况。采集表面抓样,并用 0.45μm 滤纸过滤。在扣除潜在污染后,确定纤维的丰度。在 142 个样本中记录了 233 根微纤维,平均每升 0.98 根微纤维。随后的微傅里叶变换红外光谱显示,一半的纤维是塑料,另一半是非塑料,但都有人为来源。纤维丰度、污水处理厂位置或人口密度之间没有关系。根据这一数据推断,并利用可用的水文数据,每天有 34.4%的哈德逊河流域排水面积将平均 3 亿个人造微纤维输入大西洋。