Avissar Michael, Powell Fon, Ilieva Irena, Respino Matteo, Gunning Faith M, Liston Conor, Dubin Marc J
Division of Experimental Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):919-925. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive, safe, and efficacious treatment for depression. TMS has been shown to normalize abnormal functional connectivity of cortico-cortical circuits in depression and baseline functional connectivity of these circuits predicts treatment response. Less is known about the relationship between functional connectivity of frontostriatal circuits and treatment response.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We investigated whether baseline functional connectivity of distinct frontostriatal circuits predicted response to TMS.
Resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) was acquired in 27 currently depressed subjects with treatment resistant depression and 27 healthy controls. Depressed subjects were treated with 5 weeks of daily TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The functional connectivity between limbic, executive, rostral motor, and caudal motor regions of frontal cortex and their corresponding striatal targets were determined at baseline using an existing atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging. TMS treatment response was measured by percent reduction in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD24). In an exploratory analysis, correlations were determined between baseline functional connectivity and TMS treatment response.
Seven cortical clusters belonging to the executive and rostral motor frontostriatal projections had reduced functional connectivity in depression compared to healthy controls. No frontostriatal projections showed increased functional connectivity in depression (voxel-wise p < 0.01, family-wise α < 0.01). Only baseline functional connectivity between the left DLPFC and the striatum predicted TMS response. Higher baseline functional connectivity correlated with greater reductions in HAMD (Pearson's R = 0.58, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION(S): In an exploratory analysis, higher functional connectivity between the left DLPFC and striatum predicted better treatment response. Our findings suggest that the antidepressant mechanism of action of TMS may require connectivity from cortex proximal to the stimulation site to the striatum.
重复经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种治疗抑郁症的非侵入性、安全且有效的方法。TMS已被证明可使抑郁症患者皮质-皮质回路异常的功能连接正常化,并且这些回路的基线功能连接可预测治疗反应。关于额纹状体回路的功能连接与治疗反应之间的关系,人们了解较少。
目的/假设:我们研究了不同额纹状体回路的基线功能连接是否能预测TMS的反应。
对27名患有难治性抑郁症的当前抑郁患者和27名健康对照者进行静息态功能磁共振成像(rsfMRI)检查。抑郁患者接受为期5周的每日左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)TMS治疗。使用基于扩散张量成像的现有图谱在基线时确定额叶皮质的边缘、执行、喙侧运动和尾侧运动区域与其相应纹状体靶点之间的功能连接。通过24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD24)评分降低的百分比来衡量TMS治疗反应。在探索性分析中,确定基线功能连接与TMS治疗反应之间的相关性。
与健康对照相比,属于执行和喙侧运动额纹状体投射的7个皮质簇在抑郁症中的功能连接减少。在抑郁症中,没有额纹状体投射显示功能连接增加(体素水平p<0.01,家族性α<0.01)。只有左侧DLPFC与纹状体之间的基线功能连接可预测TMS反应。更高的基线功能连接与HAMD更大程度的降低相关(Pearson相关系数R=0.58, p=0.002)。
在探索性分析中,左侧DLPFC与纹状体之间更高的功能连接预测了更好的治疗反应。我们的研究结果表明,TMS的抗抑郁作用机制可能需要从刺激部位近端的皮质到纹状体的连接。