Suppr超能文献

氧疗及其对伤口愈合的影响。

Oxygen therapies and their effects on wound healing.

作者信息

de Smet Gijs H J, Kroese Leonard F, Menon Anand G, Jeekel Johannes, van Pelt Antoon W J, Kleinrensink Gert-Jan, Lange Johan F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Havenziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Aug;25(4):591-608. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12561. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

Abstract

Oxygen is an important factor for wound healing. Although several different therapies investigated the use of oxygen to aid wound healing, the results of these studies are not unequivocal. This systematic review summarizes the clinical and experimental studies regarding different oxygen therapies for promoting wound healing, and evaluates the outcomes according the methodological details. A systematic literature search was conducted using Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed publisher, and Google Scholar libraries. Clinical and experimental studies investigating oxygen for wound healing were selected. Included articles were categorized according to the kind of therapy, study design, and wound type. The methodological details were extracted and analyzed. Sixty-five articles were identified and divided in three different oxygen therapies: Local oxygen therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and supplemental inspired oxygen therapy. More than half of the included local oxygen and hyperbaric oxygen studies had one or more significant positive outcomes, 77 and 63%, respectively. Supplemental inspired oxygen therapy during gastrointestinal and vascular surgery was more likely to have a positive result than during other surgical interventions reducing surgical site infections. These many positive outcomes promote the use of oxygen treatment in the stimulation of wound healing. However, the lack of clinical studies and vast methodological diversity made it impossible to perform a proper comparison within and between the different therapies. Further randomized clinical studies are warranted to examine the value of these therapies, especially studies that investigate the more patient-friendly oxygen dressings and topical wound oxygen therapies. Also, to achieve more solid and consistent data, studies should use more standardized methods and subjects.

摘要

氧气是伤口愈合的一个重要因素。尽管有几种不同的疗法研究了使用氧气来促进伤口愈合,但这些研究的结果并不明确。本系统评价总结了关于不同氧气疗法促进伤口愈合的临床和实验研究,并根据方法学细节评估结果。使用Embase、Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane、PubMed出版商和谷歌学术图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。选择了研究氧气用于伤口愈合的临床和实验研究。纳入的文章根据治疗类型、研究设计和伤口类型进行分类。提取并分析了方法学细节。共识别出65篇文章,并分为三种不同的氧气疗法:局部氧气疗法、高压氧疗法和补充吸入氧疗法。纳入的局部氧气和高压氧研究中,分别有超过一半(77%和63%)有一个或多个显著的阳性结果。与其他手术干预相比,在胃肠和血管手术中补充吸入氧疗法更有可能产生积极结果,可减少手术部位感染。这些众多的阳性结果促进了氧气治疗在刺激伤口愈合中的应用。然而,由于缺乏临床研究以及方法学的巨大差异,无法在不同疗法之间进行适当的比较。有必要进行进一步随机临床研究以检验这些疗法的价值,特别是研究更方便患者的氧气敷料和局部伤口氧气疗法。此外,为了获得更可靠和一致的数据,研究应采用更标准化的方法和研究对象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验