Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Providence Hospital/Ascension Health, Southfield, MI, USA, and Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Pain. 2017 Dec;158(12):2354-2363. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001036.
Patients with fibromyalgia (FM) experience increased lifetime levels of psychosocial adversity, trauma, and emotional conflict. To address these risk factors, we developed emotion awareness and expression therapy (EAET) and tested its benefits against an active control condition, FM education, and the field's gold standard intervention for FM, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for symptom management. Adults with FM (N = 230) formed 40 treatment groups, which were randomized to EAET, CBT, or education and given 8, 90-minute sessions. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up (primary end point). Retention of patients to follow-up was excellent (90.4%). Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that although EAET did not differ from FM education on pain severity (primary outcome), EAET had significantly better outcomes than FM education on overall symptoms, widespread pain, physical functioning, cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression, positive affect, and life satisfaction (between-condition d's ranging from 0.29-0.45 SD) and the percentage of patients reporting being "very much/much" improved (34.8% vs 15.4%). Emotional awareness and expression therapy did not differ from CBT on the primary or most secondary outcomes, but compared to CBT, EAET led to significantly lower FM symptoms (d = 0.35) and widespread pain (d = 0.37) and a higher percentage of patients achieving 50% pain reduction (22.5% vs 8.3%). In summary, an intervention targeting emotional awareness and expression related to psychosocial adversity and conflict was well received, more effective than a basic educational intervention, and had some advantages over CBT on pain. We conclude that EAET should be considered as an additional treatment option for FM.
纤维肌痛 (FM) 患者经历了一生中更高水平的心理社会逆境、创伤和情绪冲突。为了解决这些风险因素,我们开发了情绪意识和表达疗法 (EAET),并将其与积极对照组、FM 教育以及该领域 FM 的金标准干预认知行为疗法 (CBT) 进行了比较,后者用于症状管理。230 名 FM 成年患者组成 40 个治疗组,随机分为 EAET、CBT 或教育组,并接受 8 次、每次 90 分钟的治疗。在基线、治疗后和 6 个月随访时(主要终点)评估患者报告的结果。患者随访的保留率非常高(90.4%)。意向治疗分析表明,尽管 EAET 在疼痛严重程度上与 FM 教育没有差异(主要结果),但在总体症状、广泛疼痛、身体功能、认知功能障碍、焦虑、抑郁、积极情绪和生活满意度方面,EAET 的结果明显优于 FM 教育(组间 d 值范围为 0.29-0.45 SD),并且报告“非常/相当”改善的患者比例也更高(34.8%比 15.4%)。在主要和大多数次要结果上,情绪意识和表达疗法与 CBT 没有差异,但与 CBT 相比,EAET 导致 FM 症状(d = 0.35)和广泛疼痛(d = 0.37)明显降低,并且达到 50%疼痛缓解的患者比例更高(22.5%比 8.3%)。总之,针对与心理社会逆境和冲突相关的情绪意识和表达的干预措施受到了很好的接受,比基本的教育干预更有效,并且在疼痛方面优于 CBT。我们得出结论,EAET 应被视为 FM 的另一种治疗选择。