Vestergaard Sonja, Andersen-Ranberg Karen, Skytthe Axel, Christensen Kaare, Robine Jean-Marie, Jeune Bernard
Danish Aging Research Center, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9.B., 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Eur J Ageing. 2015 Sep 8;13(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s10433-015-0354-z. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Using the results from measures of functional ability, cognitive and physical performance from two adjacent birth cohorts of 100-year-old adults, we aimed to elucidate the possible impact of difference in participation rates, design, and interviewer mode. Participants were birth cohort members born in 1910 (DK-1910) and 1911-12 (DK-1911). Both surveys used the same assessment instruments, but the design was different, and data collection was carried out by trained survey agency interviewers in DK-1910 and trained nurses in DK-1911. Participation rate in DK-1911 (49.8 % (251/504)) was lower than in DK-1910 (66.9 % (273/408)) ( < 0.001). The proportion of interviews with the participant answering alone or mainly alone was significantly higher in DK-1911 (77 %) than in DK-1910 (56 %), and the proportion living in nursing home was significantly lower (44 vs. 54 %, respectively). Higher proportions of DK-1911 independently performed all activities of daily living (ADL) compared to DK-1910, but only significantly for toileting, bathing, and feeding (all < 0.01). Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score was higher in DK-1911 than in DK-1910 (23.5 vs. 21.0; < 0.001). Handgrip strength, gait speed, and chair stand were almost similar. DK-1911 participants had significantly better one-year survival than DK-1911 non-participants and DK-1910 participants and non-participants ( = 0.001). These results suggest that lower participation rate entails selection towards healthier participants in terms of ADL and cognitive functioning. Caution is warranted when comparing studies of centenarians with different participation rates, design, and interviewer mode, and further studies of these methodological issues are required.
利用来自两个相邻出生队列的100岁成年人的功能能力、认知和身体表现测量结果,我们旨在阐明参与率、设计和访谈者模式差异可能产生的影响。参与者是1910年出生的队列成员(DK - 1910)和1911 - 1912年出生的(DK - 1911)。两项调查都使用相同的评估工具,但设计不同,数据收集在DK - 1910由经过培训的调查机构访谈者进行,在DK - 1911由经过培训的护士进行。DK - 1911的参与率(49.8%(251/504))低于DK - 1910(66.9%(273/408))(<0.001)。DK - 1911中参与者独自或主要独自回答的访谈比例(77%)显著高于DK - 1910(56%),且住在养老院的比例显著更低(分别为44%和54%)。与DK - 1910相比,DK - 1911中有更高比例的人能独立完成所有日常生活活动(ADL),但仅在如厕、洗澡和进食方面有显著差异(均<0.01)。DK - 1911的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分高于DK - 1910(23.5对21.0;<0.001)。握力、步速和从椅子上站起的能力几乎相似。DK - 1911的参与者一年生存率显著高于DK - 1911的非参与者以及DK - 1910的参与者和非参与者(=0.001)。这些结果表明,较低的参与率意味着在ADL和认知功能方面会选择更健康的参与者。在比较不同参与率、设计和访谈者模式的百岁老人研究时需谨慎,并且需要对这些方法学问题进行进一步研究。