Brown Stephen, Johnston Bradley, Amaria Khush, Watkins Jessica, Campbell Fiona, Pehora Carolyne, McGrath Patricia
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, TorontoOntario, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.05.039. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
Treatment of neuropathic pain in children is challenging, and requires a multimodal approach of pharmacologic, physical, and psychological therapies; however there is little evidence to guide practice. Amitriptyline and gabapentin are first-line drugs for treating neuropathic pain in adults, yet no studies have examined their efficacy, or compared them directly, to determine which might be better for pain relief and sleep disturbance in children.
After informed consent was obtained, 34 patients aged 7-18 years diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) or a neuropathic pain condition were randomly allocated to receive either amitriptyline or gabapentin. Patients were followed for 6 weeks and assessed for pain intensity, sleep quality and adverse events. We blinded study personnel, including health-care providers, participants, parents, the research coordinator and the data analyst. Patients then completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) and a psychosocial pain assessment with the team psychologist, within 1-3 days of the start of the trial.
At the end of the 6-week trial, patients on both drugs had important reductions in pain, having surpassed the minimally important difference (MID) of 1. The difference between the groups however was not statistically significant. For the secondary outcomes, we found no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in sleep score or adverse events suggesting that both drugs improve sleep score to a similar degree and are equally safe.
Amitriptyline and gabapentin significantly decreased pain intensity scores and improved sleep. There were no significant differences between the two drugs in their effects on pain reduction or sleep disability.
Although larger, multi-centred trials are needed to confirm our findings, including long-term follow-up, both drugs appear to be safe and effective in treating paediatric patients in the first-line treatment of CRPS I and neuropathic pain over 6-weeks.
儿童神经性疼痛的治疗具有挑战性,需要采用药物、物理和心理治疗的多模式方法;然而,几乎没有证据可指导实践。阿米替林和加巴喷丁是治疗成人神经性疼痛的一线药物,但尚无研究检验它们的疗效,或直接比较它们,以确定哪种药物对缓解儿童疼痛和睡眠障碍可能更好。
在获得知情同意后,将34名年龄在7至18岁、被诊断为I型复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS I)或神经性疼痛疾病的患者随机分配接受阿米替林或加巴喷丁治疗。对患者进行为期6周的随访,并评估疼痛强度、睡眠质量和不良事件。我们对研究人员进行了盲法处理,包括医疗保健提供者、参与者、家长、研究协调员和数据分析师。患者在试验开始后的1至3天内,然后与团队心理学家一起完成定量感觉测试(QST)和心理社会疼痛评估。
在为期6周的试验结束时,两种药物治疗的患者疼痛均有显著减轻,超过了最小重要差异(MID)1。然而,两组之间的差异无统计学意义。对于次要结果,我们发现两种药物在睡眠评分或不良事件方面无统计学显著差异,这表明两种药物对睡眠评分的改善程度相似,且安全性相同。
阿米替林和加巴喷丁均显著降低了疼痛强度评分并改善了睡眠。两种药物在减轻疼痛或睡眠障碍方面的效果无显著差异。
尽管需要更大规模的多中心试验来证实我们的发现,包括长期随访,但两种药物在CRPS I和神经性疼痛的6周一线治疗中,对儿科患者的治疗似乎都是安全有效的。