Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉脉搏波速度的变化及动脉僵硬度改善的预测因素

Changes in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity and the Predictors of Improvement in Arterial Stiffness Following Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Cantürk Emir, Çakal Beytullah, Karaca Oğuz, Omaygenç Onur, Salihi Salih, Özyüksel Arda, Akçevin Atıf

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dragos Hospital, Bezm-i Alem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct 20;23(5):248-255. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00062. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The interaction between valvular aortic stenosis (AS) and arterial stiffness, as well as the impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on arterial stiffness, remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the degree of AS severity on non-invasive pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements. We also searched whether the AVR procedure favorably affects PWV.

METHODS

In all, 38 patients undergoing AVR for chronic AS were included. The degree of aortic stiffness was measured with PWV at both baseline and 6 months after AVR. Improvement in aortic stiffness was defined as the absolute decrease in PWV at 6 months compared to the baseline value.

RESULTS

The study population had a mean age of 59 ± 16 years, mean aortic gradient of 47.1 ± 6.4 mmHg, and mean aortic valve area (AVA) index of 0.45 ± 0.11 cm² /m² . Baseline PWV values correlated positively with the mean aortic gradient (r = 0.350, p = 0.031) and negatively with the AVA index (r = -0.512, p = 0.001). The mean PWV improved in 20 patients (53%) and worsened in 18 patients (47%). The baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (odds ratio [OR] = 1.023, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-1.041, p = 0.041) and AVA index (OR = 1.040, 96% CI = 1.023-1.057, p = 0.028) emerged as the independent predictors of improvement in PWV following AVR.

CONCLUSION

The severity of AS was significantly associated with baseline PWV. In general, the mean PWV did not change with AVR. Baseline NYHA class and the AVA index independently predicted PWV improvement following AVR. Since the change in PWV after AVR was polarized based on the patients' characteristics, such as preoperative NYHA functional class or AVA index, further studies are needed to confirm clinical significance of PWV change following AVR in severe AS patients.

摘要

背景

瓣膜性主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)与动脉僵硬度之间的相互作用,以及主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)对动脉僵硬度的影响仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在评估非侵入性脉搏波速度(PWV)测量中AS的严重程度。我们还探究了AVR手术是否对PWV有有利影响。

方法

总共纳入了38例因慢性AS接受AVR的患者。在基线和AVR术后6个月时用PWV测量主动脉僵硬度。主动脉僵硬度的改善定义为术后6个月时PWV相对于基线值的绝对下降。

结果

研究人群的平均年龄为59±16岁,平均主动脉压力阶差为47.1±6.4 mmHg,平均主动脉瓣面积(AVA)指数为0.45±0.11 cm²/m²。基线PWV值与平均主动脉压力阶差呈正相关(r = 0.350,p = 0.031),与AVA指数呈负相关(r = -0.512,p = 0.001)。20例患者(53%)的平均PWV改善,18例患者(47%)的平均PWV恶化。基线纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级(优势比[OR]=1.023,95%置信区间[CI]=1.005-1.041,p = 0.041)和AVA指数(OR = 1.040,96%CI = 1.023-1.057,p = 0.028)是AVR术后PWV改善的独立预测因素。

结论

AS的严重程度与基线PWV显著相关。总体而言,平均PWV在AVR后未发生变化。基线NYHA分级和AVA指数独立预测AVR术后PWV的改善。由于AVR后PWV的变化基于患者特征(如术前NYHA功能分级或AVA指数)呈两极分化,因此需要进一步研究以证实严重AS患者AVR后PWV变化的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Changes in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity and the Predictors of Improvement in Arterial Stiffness Following Aortic Valve Replacement.
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct 20;23(5):248-255. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00062. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
2
Aortic stiffness is an indicator of cognitive dysfunction before and after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;19(4):595-604. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu194. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
3
Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;9(7):797-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.026. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Arterial Stiffness in Aortic Stenosis: Relationship with Severity and Echocardiographic Procedures Response.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017 Mar;24(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s40292-016-0176-x. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
6
High aortic pulse wave velocity is associated with poor quality of life in surgical aortic valve stenosis patients.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;19(2):189-97. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu156. Epub 2014 May 20.
10
Natural history of coexistent mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1032-9, 1042.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

5
Photoplethysmography for the Assessment of Arterial Stiffness.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 17;23(24):9882. doi: 10.3390/s23249882.
6
Arterial stiffness in aortic stenosis - complex clinical and prognostic implications.
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2022 Dec;166(4):369-379. doi: 10.5507/bp.2022.040. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
8
Arterial Stiffness in Aortic Stenosis and the Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Mar 8;18:117-122. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S358741. eCollection 2022.
9
A case of aortic dissection in familial Mediterranean fever.
J Cardiol Cases. 2021 Jun 5;24(6):296-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2021.05.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Arterial Stiffness Changes in Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients Submitted to Valve Replacement Surgery.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Mar;116(3):475-482. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190577.

本文引用的文献

2
Aortic stiffness is an indicator of cognitive dysfunction before and after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;19(4):595-604. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu194. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
3
Carotid artery and aortic stiffness evaluation in aortic stenosis.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Apr;27(4):385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
Four-variable risk model in men and women with heart failure.
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):88-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000404. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
5
Impact of preoperative symptoms on postoperative survival in severe aortic stenosis: implications for the timing of surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Mar;97(3):803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.059. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
6
Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure.
Hypertension. 2011 Nov;58(5):825-32. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.176313. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
7
Impact of aortic stiffness on left ventricular function and B-type natriuretic peptide release in severe aortic stenosis.
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Nov;12(11):850-6. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer120. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
8
Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria.
Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):229-31. doi: 10.1097/mbp.0b013e328339be38.
10
A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method.
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Aug;24(8):498-504. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.27. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验