Uhlig Till, Goll Guro L
National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology.
Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Aug 1;56(suppl_4):iv49-iv62. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex276.
Biologic therapies have become central to the long-term management of many chronic diseases, including inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Over recent years, the development and licensing pathways for biosimilars have become more standardized, and several biosimilars have been made available for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, such as RA. Pre-licensing requirements for biosimilars mandate the demonstration of comparability with reference products in terms of clinical activity, safety and immunogenicity, whereas post-marketing surveillance and risk minimization requirements are set in place to ensure that long-term, real-world safety data are collected to assess biosimilars in clinical practice. These measures should provide a foundation for physician confidence in biosimilars, which can be established further through clinical experience. Biosimilars may help to fill an unmet need by improving patient access to effective biologic treatments for chronic diseases. Greater access may result in additional clinical benefits, with appropriate use of biologic therapies according to treatment guidelines being associated with improved outcomes and the potential for reduced costs of care. Key challenges for the integration of biosimilars into everyday practice include questions about interchangeability, switching and automatic substitution. Several switching studies have shown that biosimilars can be used in place of reference products while maintaining efficacy and safety. Additional ongoing studies and registries may help to optimize the process of switching, and different funding models are examining the optimal mechanisms to ensure effective uptake of these new treatments.
生物疗法已成为包括炎性风湿性疾病在内的许多慢性疾病长期管理的核心。近年来,生物类似药的研发和许可途径变得更加标准化,并且已有几种生物类似药可供炎性风湿性疾病患者使用,如类风湿关节炎患者。生物类似药的许可前要求规定需在临床活性、安全性和免疫原性方面证明与参照产品具有可比性,而上市后监测和风险最小化要求则是为了确保收集长期的真实世界安全性数据,以在临床实践中评估生物类似药。这些措施应为医生对生物类似药的信心奠定基础,而这种信心可通过临床经验进一步确立。生物类似药可能有助于满足未被满足的需求,即改善患者获得慢性疾病有效生物治疗的机会。更大的可及性可能带来更多临床益处,按照治疗指南合理使用生物疗法与改善治疗效果及降低护理成本的潜力相关。将生物类似药纳入日常临床实践的主要挑战包括关于可互换性、换药和自动替换的问题。多项换药研究表明,生物类似药可替代参照产品使用,同时保持疗效和安全性。正在进行的其他研究和登记可能有助于优化换药过程,不同的资助模式正在研究确保有效采用这些新疗法的最佳机制。