Suppr超能文献

两项随机研究的患者报告结局比较了每周一次应用阿莫罗芬 5%指甲油与其他局部治疗方法治疗远端和侧位甲下型真菌感染的疗效。

Patient-reported outcomes from two randomised studies comparing once-weekly application of amorolfine 5% nail lacquer to other methods of topical treatment in distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Universitäts-Hautklinik, Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2017 Dec;60(12):800-807. doi: 10.1111/myc.12676. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

Abstract

Patient adherence is a key consideration in the choice of a topical regimen for the treatment of onychomycosis. The objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported outcomes (treatment utilisation, adherence and satisfaction) in onychomycosis treated with once-weekly amorolfine 5% nail lacquer versus once-daily ciclopirox 8% nail lacquer (Study A) or once-daily urea 40% ointment/bifonazole 1% cream combination regimen (Study B). Study A: Subjects received amorolfine and ciclopirox on opposite feet for 12 weeks. Study B: Subjects received amorolfine and urea/bifonazole on opposite feet for 6-7 weeks. Assessments included subject adherence as per label, treatment preference and questionnaire. Study A: More subjects adhered to amorolfine (85%) than to ciclopirox (60%) (P = .025). Overall, subjects were satisfied (95% vs 100%, respectively) and the treatments were balanced in terms of preference (50% vs 45%) at week 12. Study B: More subjects adhered to amorolfine dosage (81.8%) than to the dosage of the urea/bifonazole combination regimen (59.1%) (P = .096). At the end of study, 85.7% of subjects preferred amorolfine versus 14.3% for urea/bifonazole. Fewer subjects experienced local side effects with amorolfine (4.5%) compared to urea (27.3%) and bifonazole (15%). Amorolfine 5% nail lacquer offers a simple and convenient treatment option, which may result in improved patient adherence and consequently lead to improved efficacy and patient satisfaction.

摘要

患者依从性是治疗甲真菌病选择局部治疗方案的关键考虑因素。本研究旨在调查每周一次阿莫罗芬 5%指甲油与每日一次环吡酮 8%指甲油(研究 A)或每日一次尿素 40%软膏/联苯苄唑 1%乳膏联合方案(研究 B)治疗甲真菌病的患者报告结局(治疗利用、依从性和满意度)。研究 A:受试者在相对的脚上接受阿莫罗芬和环吡酮治疗,为期 12 周。研究 B:受试者在相对的脚上接受阿莫罗芬和尿素/联苯苄唑治疗,为期 6-7 周。评估包括根据标签评估受试者的依从性、治疗偏好和问卷调查。研究 A:更多的受试者依从阿莫罗芬(85%)而不是环吡酮(60%)(P=0.025)。总体而言,在第 12 周时,受试者对治疗感到满意(分别为 95%和 100%),并且治疗偏好平衡(分别为 50%和 45%)。研究 B:更多的受试者依从阿莫罗芬剂量(81.8%)而不是尿素/联苯苄唑联合方案的剂量(59.1%)(P=0.096)。研究结束时,85.7%的受试者更喜欢阿莫罗芬,而 14.3%的受试者更喜欢尿素/联苯苄唑。与尿素(27.3%)和联苯苄唑(15%)相比,阿莫罗芬引起的局部副作用较少(4.5%)。阿莫罗芬 5%指甲油提供了一种简单方便的治疗选择,可能会提高患者的依从性,从而提高疗效和患者满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验