Shahbazian J H, Hahn P D, Ludwig S, Ferguson J, Baron P, Christ A, Spicer K, Tolomeo P, Torrie A M, Bilker W B, Cluzet V C, Hu B, Julian K, Nachamkin I, Rankin S C, Morris D O, Lautenbach E, Davis M F
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Oct 31;83(22). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01369-17. Print 2017 Nov 15.
Patients with community-onset (CO) methicillin-resistant (MRSA) infections contribute to MRSA contamination of the home environment and may be reexposed to MRSA strains from this reservoir. This study evaluates One Health risk factors, which focus on the relationship between humans, animals, and the environment, for the increased prevalence of multiple antimicrobial-resistant MRSA isolates in the home environment. During a trial of patients with CO-MRSA infection, MRSA was isolated from the household environment at the baseline and 3 months later, following randomization of patients and household members to mupirocin-based decolonization therapy or an education control group. Up to two environmental MRSA isolates collected at each visit were tested. MRSA isolates were identified in 68% (65/95) of homes at the baseline ( = 104 isolates) and 51% (33/65) of homes 3 months later ( = 56 isolates). The rates of multidrug resistance (MDR) were 61% among isolates collected at the baseline and 55% among isolates collected at the visit 3 months later. At the baseline, 100% (14/14) of MRSA isolates from rural homes were MDR. While antimicrobial use by humans or pets was associated with an increased risk for the isolation of MDR MRSA from the environment, clindamycin use was not associated with an increased risk for the isolation of MDR MRSA. Incident low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA strains were isolated at 3 months from 2 (5%) of 39 homes that were randomized to mupirocin treatment but none of the control homes. Among patients recently treated for a CO-MRSA infection, MRSA and MDR MRSA were common contaminants in the home environment. This study contributes to evidence that occupant use of antimicrobial drugs, except for clindamycin, is associated with MDR MRSA in the home environmental reservoir. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00966446.) MRSA is a common bacterial agent implicated in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in both community and health care settings. Patients with CO-MRSA infections contribute to environmental MRSA contamination in these settings and may be reexposed to MRSA strains from these reservoirs. People interact with natural and built environments; therefore, understanding the relationships between humans and animals as well as the characteristics of environmental reservoirs is important to advance strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance. Household interactions may influence the frequency and duration of exposure, which in turn may impact the duration of MRSA colonization or the probability for recurrent colonization and infection. Therefore, MRSA contamination of the home environment may contribute to human and animal recolonization and decolonization treatment failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate One Health risk factors that may be amenable to intervention and may influence the recovery of MDR and mupirocin resistance in CO-MRSA isolates.
社区获得性(CO)耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染患者会导致家庭环境受到MRSA污染,并且可能再次接触到来自该储存库的MRSA菌株。本研究评估了“同一健康”风险因素,该因素聚焦于人类、动物与环境之间的关系,以探究家庭环境中多重耐药MRSA分离株患病率增加的原因。在一项针对CO-MRSA感染患者的试验中,在患者和家庭成员被随机分配至基于莫匹罗星的去定植治疗组或教育对照组后,于基线期和3个月后从家庭环境中分离出MRSA。每次访视时收集的至多两份环境MRSA分离株进行检测。在基线期,68%(65/95)的家庭中鉴定出MRSA分离株(共104株),3个月后,51%(33/65)的家庭中鉴定出MRSA分离株(共56株)。基线期收集的分离株中多重耐药(MDR)率为61%,3个月后访视时收集的分离株中多重耐药率为55%。在基线期,来自农村家庭的MRSA分离株100%(14/14)为多重耐药。虽然人类或宠物使用抗菌药物与从环境中分离出MDR MRSA的风险增加有关,但使用克林霉素与分离出MDR MRSA的风险增加无关。在随机分配至莫匹罗星治疗的39户家庭中,有2户(5%)在3个月时分离出了新出现的低水平耐莫匹罗星MRSA菌株,而对照组家庭中未分离到。在近期接受过CO-MRSA感染治疗的患者中,MRSA和MDR MRSA是家庭环境中的常见污染物。本研究为以下证据提供了支持:除克林霉素外,居住者使用抗菌药物与家庭环境储存库中的MDR MRSA有关。(本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT00966446。)MRSA是社区和医疗环境中皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)的常见病原体。CO-MRSA感染患者会导致这些环境中的MRSA环境污染,并且可能再次接触到来自这些储存库的MRSA菌株。人类与自然环境和人造环境相互作用;因此,了解人类与动物之间的关系以及环境储存库的特征对于推进抗击抗菌药物耐药性的策略很重要。家庭互动可能会影响接触的频率和持续时间,进而可能影响MRSA定植的持续时间或再次定植和感染的可能性。因此,家庭环境中的MRSA污染可能导致人类和动物重新定植以及去定植治疗失败。本研究的目的是评估可能易于干预且可能影响CO-MRSA分离株中MDR和耐莫匹罗星情况的“同一健康”风险因素。