Hou Xiaomeng, Zhang Hong, Kou Lei, Lv Wei, Lu Jingjing, Li Ji
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(42):e8315. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008315.
Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) has recently been recognized as a significant global health burden. In China, the diagnosis of CPA is still unfamiliar to most doctors. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical manifestations and diagnoses of CPA in China.A multidisciplinary team of doctors retrospectively screened 690 records of patients diagnosed with pulmonary aspergillosis from January 2000 to December 2016 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. Of these, 69 patients were diagnosed with CPA. The patients' clinical characteristics were then retrieved and analyzed. Demographic, laboratory, and radiological data for these patients were compared by CPA type.Of the 69 patients diagnosed with CPA, 10 patients were diagnosed with chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis (CCPA), 15 patients with semi-invasive aspergillosis (SAIA), 41 patients with simple aspergilloma, and 3 patients with Aspergillus nodule. Further, 53.3% of the SAIA patients were obviously immunocompromised, and 60% of the CCPA patients, 26.7% of the SAIA patients, 7.3% of the simple aspergilloma cases were mildly immunocompromised. Previous underlying lung abnormalities were observed in 20% of CCPA patients, 53.3% of SAIA patients, and 80.5% of simple aspergilloma patients. The most common symptoms in the CPA patients were cough (92.8%), hemoptysis (63.8%), chronic sputum (23.2%), and fever (17.4%). The most common computerized tomography abnormalities were cavities (94.2%), nodule (84.1%), consolidation (4.3%), pleural thickening (2.9%), and infiltration (2.9%). CCPA, SAIA and simple aspergilloma patients were significantly different with respect to their course before diagnosis, constitutional symptoms, fever, hemoptysis, breathlessness, white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein count, presence of nodule, and presence of a solitary lesion (all P < .05). Furthermore, SAIA patients had a significantly shorter course before diagnosis and a significantly higher white blood cell count compared with CCPA patients (both P < .01).In China, underlying systemic immunocompromising conditions and lung diseases with mechanical impediments contribute to CPA. Simple aspergillosis was the most common diagnosis in CPA patients. The imaging characteristics of simple aspergillosis and Aspergillus nodules were quite discriminable, while CCPA, and SAIA were similar in their clinical and radiological features. Distinguishing between CCPA and SAIA depends mainly on the physician's clinical judgment.
慢性肺曲霉病(CPA)最近已被公认为一项重大的全球健康负担。在中国,大多数医生对CPA的诊断仍不熟悉。本研究的目的是阐述中国CPA的临床表现及诊断情况。一个多学科医生团队回顾性筛查了2000年1月至2016年12月在中国北京协和医院诊断为肺曲霉病的690例患者的记录。其中,69例患者被诊断为CPA。随后检索并分析了这些患者的临床特征。通过CPA类型对这些患者的人口统计学、实验室及影像学数据进行了比较。
在69例诊断为CPA的患者中,10例被诊断为慢性空洞型肺曲霉病(CCPA),15例为半侵袭性曲霉病(SAIA),41例为单纯曲霉球,3例为曲霉结节。此外,SAIA患者中有53.3%存在明显免疫功能低下,CCPA患者中有60%、SAIA患者中有26.7%、单纯曲霉球病例中有7.3%存在轻度免疫功能低下。20%的CCPA患者、53.3%的SAIA患者和80.5%的单纯曲霉球患者既往存在潜在肺部异常。CPA患者最常见的症状为咳嗽(92.8%)、咯血(63.8%)、慢性咳痰(23.2%)和发热(17.4%)。最常见的计算机断层扫描异常为空洞(94.2%)、结节(84.1%)、实变(4.3%)、胸膜增厚(2.9%)和浸润(2.9%)。CCPA、SAIA和单纯曲霉球患者在诊断前病程、全身症状、发热、咯血、气促、白细胞计数、红细胞沉降率、高敏C反应蛋白计数、结节存在情况及孤立性病变存在情况方面均存在显著差异(均P<0.05)。此外,与CCPA患者相比,SAIA患者诊断前病程显著更短,白细胞计数显著更高(均P<0.01)。
在中国,潜在的全身性免疫功能低下状况及伴有机械性阻碍的肺部疾病与CPA有关。单纯曲霉病是CPA患者中最常见的诊断类型。单纯曲霉病和曲霉结节的影像学特征有明显差异,而CCPA和SAIA在临床及影像学特征方面相似。区分CCPA和SAIA主要取决于医生的临床判断。