Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Xiang #37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Urolithiasis. 2018 Oct;46(5):493-499. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1012-z. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
To evaluate the efficiency and safety of preoperative double-J stent placement for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). All analyses were performed by the Review Manager 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Stone-free rate (SFR) was regarded as primary outcome. Second outcomes, including operation time, complication rates as well as major complication rates were also assessed. A total of 11,239 patients (2605 with and 8634 without preoperative stent) from nine retrospective studies were included. Our pooled analysis showed that SFR was significantly higher in patients with a preoperative stent than those without a stent (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.19-2.15, p = 0.002). Operation time was not significantly different between stented and non-stented groups (OR - 0.89, 95% CI - 5.79-4.01, p = 0.72). No significant differences of complication rates were observed between stented and non-stented groups (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.67-1.33, p = 0.73). Furthermore, major complication rates were not significantly different between two groups, either (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.43-2.70, p = 0.88). Generally, preoperative double-J stent placement significantly improved SFR of patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Operation time, complication rates, as well as major complication rates, were similar between stented and non-stented groups. However, the effect of preoperative double-J stent placement for different locations and burden of stones is unclear, more high-quality studies should be anticipated.
评价术前双 J 支架置入对接受输尿管镜碎石术患者的疗效和安全性。从电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库)中确定合格的研究。所有分析均由 Review Manager 5.3(Cochrane 协作组织,英国牛津)执行。结石清除率(SFR)被视为主要结局。次要结局包括手术时间、并发症发生率和主要并发症发生率。共有 9 项回顾性研究的 11239 例患者(2605 例术前放置支架,8634 例未放置支架)纳入本研究。我们的汇总分析显示,术前放置支架患者的 SFR 显著高于未放置支架患者(OR 1.60,95%CI 1.19-2.15,p=0.002)。支架组和非支架组的手术时间无显著差异(OR -0.89,95%CI -5.79-4.01,p=0.72)。支架组和非支架组的并发症发生率也无显著差异(OR 0.94,95%CI 0.67-1.33,p=0.73)。此外,两组的主要并发症发生率也无显著差异(OR 1.07,95%CI 0.43-2.70,p=0.88)。一般来说,术前双 J 支架置入可显著提高接受输尿管镜碎石术患者的 SFR。支架组和非支架组的手术时间、并发症发生率和主要并发症发生率相似。然而,术前双 J 支架置入对不同部位和结石负荷的效果尚不清楚,需要更多高质量的研究。