Krowka Sarah K, Fuchs Lynn S
Vanderbilt University.
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2017 Nov;32(4):216-230. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12146. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
This study examined differences in cognitive processing between 4-grade students who respond adequately, as opposed to inadequately, to intervention on 3 fraction outcomes: number-line estimation, calculation, and word problems. Students were assessed on 7 cognitive processes and on the 3 fraction outcomes. Students were grouped as adequate or inadequate responders, using as the cut-point the control-group mean on pre-to-post improvement on the relevant measure. Between-group differences identified reasoning, concept formation, and listening comprehension related to all 3 fraction outcomes. On the number-line outcome, within-group profile analysis indicated that inadequate responders experienced low reasoning ability relative to their other forms of cognitive processing.
本研究调查了在三个分数相关结果(数轴估计、计算和文字问题)上,对干预反应充分与反应不充分的四年级学生在认知加工方面的差异。对学生进行了7种认知过程以及这三个分数相关结果的评估。根据相关测量中对照组前后改善情况的均值作为分界点,将学生分为反应充分组和反应不充分组。组间差异表明推理、概念形成和听力理解与所有三个分数相关结果有关。在数轴结果方面,组内概况分析表明,反应不充分的学生相对于其他认知加工形式,推理能力较低。