Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Mária utca 41, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Jan;310(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s00403-017-1794-4. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is the most commonly applied measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in psoriasis patients. It is among defining criteria of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and present in treatment guidelines. Our objective was to estimate preference-based HRQoL values (i.e., utilities) for hypothetical health states described by the 10 items of the DLQI in psoriasis patients. Moreover, we compare results to findings of a similar study previously conducted among the general public. A cross-sectional survey was carried out among 238 psoriasis patients. Seven hypothetical DLQI-defined health states with total scores of 6, 11, and 16 (3-3 and 1 states, respectively) were evaluated by time trade-off method. The difference in DLQI scores between hypothetical health states was set at 5 points, as it exceeds the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Utility scores were found to be homogenous across the seven hypothetical health states (range of means for the 6-point states 0.85-0.91, range of means for the 11-point states 0.83-0.85, and mean of 0.84 for the 16-point state). Overall, mean utilities assessed by psoriasis patients were higher for all seven states compared with the general public (mean difference 0.16-0.28; p < 0.001). In 11 out of the 15 comparisons between health states with DLQI scores differing larger than the MCID, there was no statistically significant difference in utility. Thus, in clinical settings, patients with DLQI scores differing more than the MCID may have identical HRQoL. Improving the definition of moderate-to-severe disease and reconsideration of the DLQI in clinical assessment of psoriasis patients are suggested.
皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)是评估银屑病患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)最常用的指标。它是中重度银屑病的定义标准之一,也存在于治疗指南中。我们的目的是评估 DLQI 的 10 个项目所描述的假设健康状态的偏好性 HRQoL 值(即效用)。此外,我们将结果与之前在普通人群中进行的类似研究进行了比较。对 238 例银屑病患者进行了横断面调查。采用时间权衡法评估了总分为 6、11 和 16(分别为 3-3 和 1 个状态)的 7 个假设的 DLQI 定义的健康状态。假设健康状态之间的 DLQI 评分差异设定为 5 分,因为它超过了最小临床重要差异(MCID)。效用评分在七个假设的健康状态之间是同质的(6 分状态的平均值范围为 0.85-0.91,11 分状态的平均值范围为 0.83-0.85,16 分状态的平均值为 0.84)。总体而言,与普通人群相比,银屑病患者对所有七个状态的平均效用评估均较高(平均差异为 0.16-0.28;p<0.001)。在 15 个 DLQI 评分差异大于 MCID 的健康状态比较中,有 11 个比较的效用没有统计学差异。因此,在临床环境中,DLQI 评分差异大于 MCID 的患者可能具有相同的 HRQoL。建议改善中重度疾病的定义,并在评估银屑病患者的临床评估中重新考虑 DLQI。