First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Second Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1680-1687. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30696-4. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
A high proportion of patients with relapsed classical Hodgkin's lymphoma achieve a response with the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin, and the drug is well tolerated. We modified the escalated BEACOPP regimen (eBEACOPP; bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) and implemented brentuximab vedotin with the aim to reduce toxic effects while maintaining the protocol's efficacy.
We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study at 20 study sites in Germany. Adult patients (aged 18-60 years) with newly diagnosed, advanced, classical Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with six cycles of either BrECAPP (brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg on day 1, etoposide 200 mg/m on days 2-4, doxorubicin 35 mg/m on day 2, cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m on day 2, procarbazine 100 mg/m on days 2-8, and prednisone 40 mg/m on days 2-15) or BrECADD (brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg on day 1, etoposide 150 mg/m on days 2-4, doxorubicin 40 mg/m on day 2, cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m on day 2, dacarbazine 250 mg/m on days 3-4, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 2-5). Randomisation was done centrally by stratified minimisation, with study site and sex as stratification factors. The co-primary endpoints were complete response to chemotherapy and complete remission at the end of treatment, which were assessed by intention to treat. Patients who were found not to meet inclusion criteria after randomisation or without restaging data after two cycles of study treatment were excluded from the primary endpoint analysis. All patients who started study treatment were assessable for safety. This report presents the final analysis at a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 13·2-21·5). The preplanned 2-year follow-up analysis is yet to be reported. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01569204.
Between Oct 26, 2012, and May 15, 2014, 104 patients were enrolled to the study (52 were assigned to each study arm). Two patients dropped out before the start of study treatment because of acute infection (n=1) and withdrawal of consent (n=1) and one patient was excluded because of intermediate-stage disease (all were assigned BrECAPP). 42 (86%, 95% CI 73-94) of 49 patients assigned BrECAPP achieved a complete response after chemotherapy and 46 (94%, 95% CI 83-99) had complete remission as their final treatment outcome. In the BrECADD group, 46 (88%, 95% CI 77-96) of 52 patients achieved both a complete response after chemotherapy and complete remission as their final treatment outcome. 58 serious adverse events were reported, 32 events in 21 of 50 patients who received BrECAPP and 26 events in 18 of 52 patients who received BrECADD. The most common grade 3-4 toxic effects were haematological adverse events (91 [89%] of 102 patients). Grade 3-4 organ toxic effects were reported in seven (17%) of 42 patients assigned BrECAPP and two (4%) of 46 allocated BrECADD. 16 (32%) of 50 patients assigned BrECAPP and 18 (35%) of 52 allocated BrECADD had grade 1-2 peripheral neuropathy, and one (2%) patient assigned BrECAPP developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; all but one case (allocated BrECAPP) resolved. No deaths were reported during the follow-up period.
Both eBEACOPP variants met the co-primary efficacy endpoints. Particularly, the BrECADD regimen was associated with a more favourable toxicity profile and was, therefore, selected to challenge standard eBEACOPP for the treatment of advanced classical Hodgkin's lymphoma in the phase 3 HD21 study by the German Hodgkin Study Group (NCT02661503), which aims to further reduce treatment-related morbidity.
Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
相当比例的复发经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤患者对抗体药物偶联物 Brentuximab vedotin 有反应,且该药物耐受性良好。我们对升级后的 BEACOPP 方案(eBEACOPP;博来霉素、依托泊苷、多柔比星、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、丙卡巴肼和泼尼松)进行了改良,并联合 Brentuximab vedotin,旨在减少毒性作用的同时保持方案疗效。
我们在德国的 20 个研究中心进行了一项开放性、多中心、随机 2 期研究。新诊断的晚期经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤的成年患者(年龄 18-60 岁),按 1:1 随机分配至接受 6 个周期的 BrECAPP(Brentuximab vedotin 1·8mg/kg,第 1 天;依托泊苷 200mg/m2,第 2-4 天;多柔比星 35mg/m2,第 2 天;环磷酰胺 1250mg/m2,第 2 天;丙卡巴肼 100mg/m2,第 2-8 天;泼尼松 40mg/m2,第 2-15 天)或 BrECADD(Brentuximab vedotin 1·8mg/kg,第 1 天;依托泊苷 150mg/m2,第 2-4 天;多柔比星 40mg/m2,第 2 天;环磷酰胺 1250mg/m2,第 2 天;达卡巴嗪 250mg/m2,第 3-4 天;地塞米松 40mg,第 2-5 天)治疗。通过分层最小化,中央随机化,分层因素为研究地点和性别。主要共同终点为化疗后的完全缓解和治疗结束时的完全缓解,通过意向治疗进行评估。在随机分组后发现不符合纳入标准或在研究治疗的两个周期后没有重新分期数据的患者,从主要终点分析中排除。所有开始研究治疗的患者都可进行安全性评估。本报告为中位随访 17 个月(IQR 13·2-21·5)时的最终分析。尚未报告计划的 2 年随访分析。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01569204。
2012 年 10 月 26 日至 2014 年 5 月 15 日期间,共纳入 104 例患者(各 52 例)。2 例患者因急性感染(n=1)和撤回同意(n=1)在开始研究治疗前退出,1 例患者因中期疾病被排除(均接受 BrECAPP 治疗)。接受 BrECAPP 治疗的 49 例患者中,42 例(86%,95%CI 73-94)在化疗后达到完全缓解,46 例(94%,95%CI 83-99)最终缓解。在 BrECADD 组中,52 例患者中有 46 例(88%,95%CI 77-96)在化疗后达到完全缓解且最终缓解。报告了 58 例严重不良事件,21 例接受 BrECAPP 治疗的 50 例患者中有 32 例事件,18 例接受 BrECADD 治疗的 52 例患者中有 26 例事件。最常见的 3-4 级血液学不良事件为(102 例患者中有 91 例[89%])。在接受 BrECAPP 治疗的 42 例患者中有 7 例(17%)和接受 BrECADD 治疗的 46 例患者中有 2 例(4%)报告了 3-4 级器官毒性。接受 BrECAPP 治疗的 50 例患者中有 16 例(32%)和接受 BrECADD 治疗的 52 例患者中有 18 例(35%)发生 1-2 级周围神经病变,1 例(2%)接受 BrECAPP 治疗的患者发生 3 级周围神经病变;所有病例均缓解(除 1 例[接受 BrECAPP 治疗])。在随访期间没有死亡报告。
两种 eBEACOPP 变体均符合主要疗效终点。特别是,BrECADD 方案与更有利的毒性特征相关,因此被选中在德国 Hodgkin 研究组(NCT02661503)的 3 期 HD21 研究中挑战标准 eBEACOPP 治疗晚期经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤,旨在进一步降低治疗相关的发病率。
武田制药。