Petrescu Cristina I
Department of Hygiene, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Victor Babes 16, 300226, Timisoara, Romania.
, Sabinei 3A/18, 300424, Timisoara, Romania.
Environ Health Prev Med. 2017 Jun 14;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12199-017-0664-1.
The aim of the performed study was to investigate personal and environmental factors as predictors of thermal sensation perceived by a population of students in a university setting.
The study consisted of two samples, a winter sample (154 students: 44.2% males and 55.8% females, aged 19-30 years) and a spring sample (147 students: 52.4% males and 47.6% females, aged 19-30 years), randomly selected from the same population of students. The method was an observational inquiry (case study) with a standardized questionnaire (11 items, 3 items for thermal sensation assessing through 3 scales with 3, 5 and 7 steps, alpha Cronbach's index 0.854) applied and establishing 3 microclimate factors (air temperature, relative humidity and wind velocity), with calculation of normal effective temperature. The survey was performed over four successive days, during two seasons (winter-February and spring-May).
The performed study demonstrated a tendency of students to perceive the comfortably cold more frequently than comfortably warm throughout the 4 days of the survey during the winter, except Monday. Thermal sensation of discomfort was more frequently perceived as warm than cold throughout the spring time of the survey and winter, except Tuesday. Predictors of thermal sensation perceived by students in the amphitheatre were as follows: nationality (-2loglikelihood change or chi square = 42.12, Sig. 0.000), relative humidity (chi square = 10.65, Sig. 0.005) and gender during the winter, and wind velocity (change in -2loglikelihood = 11.96, Sig. 0.001) and nationality during the spring.
Certain personal and environmental factors were suggested as predictors for thermal sensation perceived by a population of students in a study setting.
本研究的目的是调查个人和环境因素,作为大学环境中一群学生所感知热感觉的预测指标。
该研究包括两个样本,一个冬季样本(154名学生:44.2%为男性,55.8%为女性,年龄在19至30岁之间)和一个春季样本(147名学生:52.4%为男性,47.6%为女性,年龄在19至30岁之间),从同一学生群体中随机选取。方法是采用标准化问卷(11项,通过3级、5级和7级的3个量表评估热感觉的3项,α克朗巴哈指数0.854)进行观察性调查(案例研究),并确定3个微气候因素(气温、相对湿度和风速),计算正常有效温度。调查在两个季节(冬季 - 2月和春季 - 5月)连续四天进行。
本研究表明,在冬季调查的4天中,除周一外,学生倾向于更频繁地感知到舒适的寒冷而非舒适的温暖。在春季调查期间和冬季,除周二外,不舒服的热感觉更常被感知为温暖而非寒冷。阶梯教室里学生所感知热感觉的预测指标如下:冬季时国籍(-2对数似然变化或卡方 = 42.12,显著性0.00)、相对湿度(卡方 = 10.65,显著性0.005)和性别,以及春季时风速(-2对数似然变化 = 11.96,显著性0.001)和国籍。
在一项研究环境中,某些个人和环境因素被认为是一群学生所感知热感觉的预测指标。