Suppr超能文献

一期与二期种植手术中边缘骨吸收的比较。

Comparison of the Marginal Bone Loss in One-stage versus Two-stage Implant Surgery.

作者信息

Gheisari Rasoul, Eatemadi Hesamuddin, Alavian Akram

机构信息

Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Postgraduate Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Shiraz). 2017 Dec;18(4):272-276.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Dental implant is one of the best choices for reconstruction of aesthetic and function. High success rate of these treatments are related to some considerations such as case selection, implant system selection and surgical methods. One-stage or two-stage surgical approaches are routine surgical methods in dental implant treatments. The minimum rate of bone loss around fixtures is the most important criteria for evaluation of implant treatment success that can be affected by different methods of surgery.

PURPOSE

This experimental study has been done to compare the crestal bone loss at mesial and distal surface of implants installed through either one-stage or two-stage surgical approach.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In the present randomized clinical trial, 310 Astra Tech implant system were divided into two unequal groups to be used for 140 patients. One hundred and seventy implants were inserted through one-stage and 140 through two-stage surgical approach. The baseline parallel periapical radiography was provided immediately after the surgery. Six months after the functional loading, another radiographic image was provided by using the same technique and machine. Marginal bone loss was calculated by using Adobe Photoshop CS5 software. Data were statistically analyzed with SPSS software. values less than 0.05 were considered as significant.

RESULTS

The mean Bone loss on the mesial and distal surfaces of implants inserted through one-stage surgery and two-stage surgery was 0.76±0.04 and 0.842±0.04 mm respectively. No notable marginal bone change was observed between the maxilla (0.860mm) and mandible (0.729mm). Moreover, Value was>0.05 in all samples, indicating no significant difference in the crestal bone loss.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, one-stage surgical technique may provide better esthetic and function for dental implants. There is no significant difference between the two approaches concerning the marginal bone loss.

摘要

问题陈述

牙种植体是美学和功能重建的最佳选择之一。这些治疗的高成功率与一些因素有关,如病例选择、种植体系统选择和手术方法。一期或二期手术方法是牙种植治疗中的常规手术方法。种植体周围骨丢失的最低率是评估种植治疗成功的最重要标准,这可能会受到不同手术方法的影响。

目的

本实验研究旨在比较通过一期或二期手术方法植入的种植体近中和远中表面的牙槽嵴骨丢失情况。

材料与方法

在本随机临床试验中,将310个Astra Tech种植体系统分为两组,用于140例患者。170个种植体通过一期手术植入,140个通过二期手术植入。术后立即提供基线平行根尖片。功能加载6个月后,使用相同技术和机器提供另一张放射影像。使用Adobe Photoshop CS5软件计算边缘骨丢失。数据用SPSS软件进行统计学分析。P值小于0.05被认为具有显著性。

结果

通过一期手术和二期手术植入的种植体近中和远中表面的平均骨丢失分别为0.76±0.04和0.842±0.04mm。在上颌(0.860mm)和下颌(0.729mm)之间未观察到明显的边缘骨变化。此外,所有样本的P值均>0.05,表明牙槽嵴骨丢失无显著差异。

结论

因此,一期手术技术可为牙种植体提供更好的美学和功能。两种方法在边缘骨丢失方面无显著差异。

相似文献

6
Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1254-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01586.x.
10
Does implant staging choice affect crestal bone loss?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;70(2):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Torque-Induced Bone Texture Alterations Related to Early Marginal Jawbone Loss?
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 19;11(20):6158. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206158.
2
One-stage versus two-stage technique using two splinted extra-short implants: A multicentric split-mouth study with a one-year follow-up.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):602-610. doi: 10.1111/cid.13113. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
3
Annual incidence of osteoporotic hip fractures in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02603-1.
5
Prevalence and risk indicators for peri-implant diseases: A literature review.
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021 Nov;57:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
The long-term evaluation of the prognosis of implants with acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina: a retrospective clinical study.
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr 8;42(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00255-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
Eur J Dent. 2019 Feb;13(1):47-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688538. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
9
Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Dec 1;10(12):e1216-e1222. doi: 10.4317/jced.55396. eCollection 2018 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of marginal bone level changes on the stability of dental implants in a short-term evaluation.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1185-90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12426. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Implant loading protocols for partially edentulous patients with extended edentulous sites--a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:239-55. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.2.
3
A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:39-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x.
4
Does implant staging choice affect crestal bone loss?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;70(2):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
A 10-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of one-stage dental implants.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01479.x. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
8
A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant prognosis in periodontally compromised partially edentulous patients.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):669-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01406.x. Epub 2007 Sep 13.
9
A systematic review of marginal soft tissue at implants subjected to immediate loading or immediate restoration.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:82-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01355.x.
10
Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
Micron. 2005;36(7-8):630-44. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Sep 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验