Arthritis and Arthroplasty Design Group, The Bone and Joint Center, Magee Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1154-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.029. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
In total knee arthroplasty (TKA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), irrigation and debridement (I&D) with component retention is a treatment option with a wide variation in reported failure rates. The purpose of this study was to determine failure rates, outcomes, and factors that predict failure in I&D for TKA PJI.
A multicenter observational study of patients with a TKA PJI and subsequently undergoing an I&D with retention of components was conducted. The primary outcome was failure rate of I&D, where failure was defined as any subsequent surgical procedures.
Two hundred sixteen cases of I&D with retention of components performed on 206 patients met inclusion criteria. The estimated long-term failure rate at 4 years was 57.4%. Time-to-event analyses revealed that the median survival time was 14.32 months. Five-year mortality was 19.9%. Multivariable modeling revealed that time symptomatic and organism were independent predictors of I&D failure. Culture-negative status had a higher hazard for failure than culture-positive patients. When primary organism and time symptomatic were selected to produce an optimized scenario for an I&D, the estimated failure rate was 39.6%.
I&D with retention of components has a high failure rate, and there is a high incidence of more complex procedures after this option is chosen. The patient comorbidities we investigated did not predict I&D success. Our results suggest that I&D has a limited ability to control infection in TKA and should be used selectively under optimum conditions.
在全膝关节置换术(TKA)假体周围关节感染(PJI)中,保留假体的灌洗和清创术(I&D)是一种治疗选择,其报告的失败率差异很大。本研究的目的是确定 I&D 治疗 TKA PJI 的失败率、结果和预测失败的因素。
对 206 例 TKA PJI 患者行 I&D 并保留假体进行了多中心观察性研究。主要结局是 I&D 的失败率,失败定义为任何后续的手术程序。
206 例患者中有 216 例符合保留假体 I&D 的纳入标准。4 年时的估计长期失败率为 57.4%。时间事件分析显示,中位生存时间为 14.32 个月。5 年死亡率为 19.9%。多变量建模显示,症状出现时间和病原体是 I&D 失败的独立预测因素。培养阴性状态的失败风险高于培养阳性患者。当选择原发性病原体和症状出现时间来产生 I&D 的优化方案时,估计的失败率为 39.6%。
保留假体的 I&D 失败率较高,并且在选择此方案后,更复杂的手术发生率较高。我们研究的患者合并症并不能预测 I&D 的成功。我们的结果表明,I&D 控制 TKA 感染的能力有限,应在最佳条件下有选择地使用。