Kim Hyojin, Kwon Hyun Jung, Park Soo Young, Park Eunhyang, Chung Jin-Haeng
Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 6;8(58):98524-98532. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21567. eCollection 2017 Nov 17.
Although immune checkpoints inhibitors have exhibited promising activity in clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the current programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays are inconsistent in terms of the staining analysis and scoring system used. To verify the interchangeability of the available PD-L1 assays, we performed immunohistochemistry using three antibody clones used in clinical trials (22C3, SP263, and SP142) and the E1L3N clone as a laboratory developed test for 97 resected NSCLC specimens. Matched tissue microarray specimens were also stained. Staining with 22C3 yielded a greater proportion of stained tumor cells, whereas SP142 staining consistently labelled fewer tumor cells. However, when various cut-off criteria were applied, the positivity rates for PD-L1 were similar, with high concordance, under assay-specific cut-offs. Moreover, seven cases of discordant PD-L1 expression between the resected specimen and matched tissue microarray specimens were observed. In conclusion, despite of inter-assay variability of the PD-L1 status in NSCLC, the positivity rate appears to be similar under assay-specific criteria. Hence, an appropriate clinically defined algorithm or cut-off should be separately applied for each assay. Moreover, multiple biopsy specimens from different tumor areas should be obtained to reduce false results due to intratumoral heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression.
尽管免疫检查点抑制剂在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的临床试验中已展现出有前景的活性,但目前的程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)检测在所用的染色分析和评分系统方面并不一致。为验证现有PD-L1检测的互换性,我们使用了临床试验中使用的三种抗体克隆(22C3、SP263和SP142)以及E1L3N克隆对97例切除的NSCLC标本进行免疫组织化学检测,E1L3N克隆作为实验室研发的检测方法。匹配的组织微阵列标本也进行了染色。用22C3染色产生的染色肿瘤细胞比例更高,而SP142染色始终标记较少的肿瘤细胞。然而,当应用各种截断标准时,在特定检测的截断值下,PD-L1的阳性率相似,具有高度一致性。此外,观察到7例切除标本与匹配的组织微阵列标本之间PD-L1表达不一致的情况。总之,尽管NSCLC中PD-L1状态存在检测间的变异性,但在特定检测标准下阳性率似乎相似。因此,应针对每种检测分别应用适当的临床定义算法或截断值。此外,应从不同肿瘤区域获取多个活检标本,以减少因PD-L1表达的肿瘤内异质性导致的假结果。