Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA; Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA; Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Grodna State Medical University, Grodna, Belarus.
J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Jun;138(6):1409-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
Large excisional wounds in mice prominently regenerate new hair follicles (HFs) and fat, yet humans are deficient for this regenerative behavior. Currently, wound-induced regeneration remains a clinically desirable, but only partially understood phenomenon. We show that large excisional wounds in rats across seven strains fail to regenerate new HFs. We compared wound transcriptomes between mice and rats at the time of scab detachment, which coincides with the onset of HF regeneration in mice. In both species, wound dermis and epidermis share core dermal and epidermal transcriptional programs, respectively, yet prominent interspecies differences exist. Compared with mice, rat epidermis expresses distinct transcriptional and epigenetic factors, markers of epidermal repair, hyperplasia, and inflammation, and lower levels of WNT signaling effectors and regulators. When recombined on the surface of excisional wounds with vibrissa dermal papillae, partial-thickness skin grafts containing distal pelage HF segments, but not interfollicular epidermis, readily regenerated new vibrissa-like HFs. Together, our findings establish rats as a nonregenerating rodent model for excisional wound healing and suggest that low epidermal competence and associated transcriptional profile may contribute to its regenerative deficiency. Future comparison between rat and mouse may lend further insight into the mechanism of wounding-induced regeneration and causes for its deficit.
在小鼠中,大的切除性创伤会显著再生新的毛囊(HFs)和脂肪,但人类缺乏这种再生行为。目前,创伤诱导的再生仍然是临床上理想的,但只是部分理解的现象。我们表明,在七种大鼠品系中,大的切除性创伤不能再生新的 HFs。我们在结痂脱落时比较了小鼠和大鼠的伤口转录组,这与小鼠的 HF 再生开始时间相吻合。在这两个物种中,伤口真皮和表皮分别共享核心的真皮和表皮转录程序,但存在明显的种间差异。与小鼠相比,大鼠表皮表达独特的转录和表观遗传因子、表皮修复、增生和炎症的标志物,以及较低水平的 WNT 信号效应物和调节剂。当在切除性伤口表面与触须真皮乳头重组时,含有远端被毛 HF 段的部分厚度皮肤移植物,但不含有滤泡间表皮,容易再生出新的触须样 HF。总之,我们的发现确立了大鼠作为切除性创伤愈合的非再生啮齿动物模型,并表明低表皮能力和相关的转录谱可能导致其再生缺陷。未来在大鼠和小鼠之间的比较可能会进一步深入了解创伤诱导再生的机制及其缺陷的原因。